PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPZX vs. PRNEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPZX vs. PRNEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund (MLPZX) and T. Rowe Price New Era Fund (PRNEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPZX achieves a 18.73% return, which is significantly higher than PRNEX's 15.94% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPZX has outperformed PRNEX with an annualized return of 9.78%, while PRNEX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.51% annualized return.


MLPZX

1D
1.64%
1M
-4.72%
YTD
18.73%
6M
18.55%
1Y
22.42%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
18.61%
10Y*
9.78%

PRNEX

1D
-1.47%
1M
-5.38%
YTD
15.94%
6M
15.46%
1Y
30.96%
3Y*
14.83%
5Y*
10.80%
10Y*
8.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPZX vs. PRNEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPZX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund
18.73%7.88%24.54%20.71%25.10%44.98%-25.49%14.50%-12.92%-8.42%
PRNEX
T. Rowe Price New Era Fund
15.94%18.85%4.41%1.02%7.14%25.35%-2.63%16.91%-16.23%10.57%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPZX and PRNEX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2010

0.66

The correlation between MLPZX and PRNEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPZX vs. PRNEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPZX
MLPZX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
MLPZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

PRNEX
PRNEX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PRNEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRNEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRNEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
PRNEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRNEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPZX vs. PRNEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund (MLPZX) and T. Rowe Price New Era Fund (PRNEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MLPZXPRNEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.36

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

4.55

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.00

15.93

-5.93

MLPZX vs. PRNEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the PRNEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPZX and PRNEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MLPZX vs. PRNEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPZX drawdown since its inception was -77.56%, which is greater than PRNEX's maximum drawdown of -66.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPZX and PRNEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPZXPRNEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.56%

-66.56%

-11.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.23%

-6.79%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-20.19%

+5.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.90%

-21.50%

+3.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.62%

-49.64%

-23.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.32%

-6.79%

+1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.50%

-16.28%

+2.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

1.94%

+0.33%

Volatility

MLPZX vs. PRNEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund (MLPZX) is 4.63%, while T. Rowe Price New Era Fund (PRNEX) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that MLPZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRNEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPZXPRNEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

5.78%

-1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.97%

12.13%

-3.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.79%

15.21%

-3.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.22%

18.72%

-1.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.84%

20.57%

+5.27%

MLPZX vs. PRNEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPZX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than PRNEX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPZX vs. PRNEX - Dividend Comparison

MLPZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.15%, less than PRNEX's 7.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPZX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund
6.15%6.87%5.92%7.19%7.98%9.19%16.57%13.12%13.27%10.70%9.79%10.93%
PRNEX
T. Rowe Price New Era Fund
7.80%9.04%4.81%11.46%4.47%2.07%2.54%2.18%1.69%1.89%1.28%2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPZX and PRNEX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRNEX has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to MLPZX (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPZX dropped -77.56% vs PRNEX's -66.56%.

PRNEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPZX and PRNEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer