MLPTX vs. GAGEX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund (MLPTX) and Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund (GAGEX).
MLPTX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Mar 30, 2010. GAGEX is managed by Guinness Atkinson. It was launched on Jun 29, 2004.
Performance
MLPTX vs. GAGEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MLPTX vs. GAGEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPTX Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund | 19.65% | 8.57% | 30.35% | 22.78% | 22.02% | 40.06% | -25.31% | 7.10% | -9.46% | -3.71% |
GAGEX Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund | 37.85% | 16.88% | -1.75% | 2.66% | 34.32% | 45.96% | -34.12% | 10.45% | -18.96% | -1.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPTX achieves a 19.65% return, which is significantly lower than GAGEX's 37.85% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPTX has outperformed GAGEX with an annualized return of 11.59%, while GAGEX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.75% annualized return.
MLPTX
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 19.65%
- 6M
- 22.43%
- 1Y
- 18.87%
- 3Y*
- 26.48%
- 5Y*
- 24.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.59%
GAGEX
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 10.00%
- YTD
- 37.85%
- 6M
- 40.91%
- 1Y
- 46.83%
- 3Y*
- 19.07%
- 5Y*
- 20.53%
- 10Y*
- 8.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLPTX vs. GAGEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPTX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than GAGEX's 1.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MLPTX vs. GAGEX — Risk / Return Rank
MLPTX
GAGEX
MLPTX vs. GAGEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund (MLPTX) and Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund (GAGEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLPTX | GAGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 2.22 | -1.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 2.71 | -1.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.40 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 2.63 | -1.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.07 | 9.38 | -5.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPTX | GAGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 2.22 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.37 | 0.88 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.32 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.25 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPTX and GAGEX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MLPTX vs. GAGEX - Dividend Comparison
MLPTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, more than GAGEX's 2.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPTX Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund | 4.85% | 5.63% | 4.91% | 6.11% | 6.90% | 7.84% | 12.75% | 10.02% | 9.76% | 8.11% | 7.24% | 7.69% |
GAGEX Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund | 2.05% | 2.82% | 7.08% | 4.33% | 0.15% | 2.59% | 3.59% | 1.91% | 1.72% | 1.40% | 1.13% | 1.33% |
Drawdowns
MLPTX vs. GAGEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPTX drawdown since its inception was -75.66%, roughly equal to the maximum GAGEX drawdown of -78.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPTX and GAGEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPTX | GAGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.66% | -78.90% | +3.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.53% | -18.43% | +3.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.85% | -26.42% | +7.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.95% | -69.98% | -1.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.78% | -0.71% | -1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.80% | -29.42% | +16.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.78% | 5.18% | -0.40% |
Volatility
MLPTX vs. GAGEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund (MLPTX) is 3.21%, while Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund (GAGEX) has a volatility of 4.61%. This indicates that MLPTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAGEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MLPTX | GAGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | 4.61% | -1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.65% | 12.36% | -3.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.89% | 21.53% | -4.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 23.56% | -5.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.01% | 27.31% | -2.30% |