MLPTX vs. PGJZX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MLPTX (Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund) and PGJZX (PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MLPTX returned 10.32%/yr vs 8.93%/yr for PGJZX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MLPTX charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for PGJZX.

Performance

MLPTX vs. PGJZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund (MLPTX) and PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund (PGJZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPTX achieves a 21.29% return, which is significantly higher than PGJZX's 7.11% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPTX has outperformed PGJZX with an annualized return of 10.32%, while PGJZX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.93% annualized return.

MLPTX

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: -1.86%
• YTD: 21.29%
• 6M: 22.67%
• 1Y: 25.73%
• 3Y*: 26.08%
• 5Y*: 21.11%
• 10Y*: 10.32%

PGJZX

• 1D: -1.71%
• 1M: -4.68%
• YTD: 7.11%
• 6M: 7.87%
• 1Y: 13.49%
• 3Y*: 16.02%
• 5Y*: 9.69%
• 10Y*: 8.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPTX vs. PGJZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MLPTX Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund	21.29%	8.57%	30.35%	22.78%	22.02%	40.06%	-25.31%	7.10%	-9.46%	-3.71%
PGJZX PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund	7.11%	18.41%	17.13%	5.85%	-7.82%	15.06%	1.98%	28.89%	-8.57%	18.81%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPTX and PGJZX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014	0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between MLPTX and PGJZX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MLPTX vs. PGJZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPTX

MLPTX Risk / Return Rank: 59
MLPTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
MLPTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
MLPTX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
MLPTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
MLPTX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

PGJZX

PGJZX Risk / Return Rank: 25
PGJZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
PGJZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
PGJZX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
PGJZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
PGJZX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPTX vs. PGJZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund (MLPTX) and PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund (PGJZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MLPTX	PGJZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	1.33	+0.82
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	1.86	+1.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.24	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.86	2.11	+1.75
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.97	7.33	+5.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MLPTX vs. PGJZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the PGJZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPTX and PGJZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MLPTX	PGJZX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.15	1.33	+0.82
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.19	0.68	+0.52
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	0.57	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.53	-0.14

Drawdowns

MLPTX vs. PGJZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPTX drawdown since its inception was -75.66%, which is greater than PGJZX's maximum drawdown of -36.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPTX and PGJZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPTX	PGJZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.66%	-36.64%	-39.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.70%	-7.01%	+0.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.53%	-12.39%	-2.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.85%	-20.56%	+1.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-71.95%	-36.64%	-35.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.21%	-5.68%	-0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.69%	-5.62%	-7.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	2.02%	-0.03%

Volatility

MLPTX vs. PGJZX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund (MLPTX) has a higher volatility of 5.12% compared to PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund (PGJZX) at 3.84%. This indicates that MLPTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGJZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLPTX	PGJZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.12%	3.84%	+1.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.33%	8.94%	+0.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.62%	10.84%	+1.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.82%	14.36%	+3.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.01%	15.78%	+9.23%

MLPTX vs. PGJZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPTX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than PGJZX's 1.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPTX vs. PGJZX - Dividend Comparison

MLPTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, less than PGJZX's 6.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MLPTX Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 Fund	4.87%	5.63%	4.91%	6.11%	6.90%	7.84%	12.75%	10.02%	9.76%	8.11%	7.24%	7.69%
PGJZX PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund	6.54%	7.18%	9.95%	1.59%	3.30%	7.77%	1.17%	1.58%	2.13%	1.35%	1.71%	1.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPTX and PGJZX in my portfolio?

MLPTX and PGJZX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MLPTX or PGJZX?

MLPTX has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to PGJZX (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPTX dropped -75.66% vs PGJZX's -36.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MLPTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.