PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPS.L vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPS.L vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPS.L) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPS.L achieves a 19.52% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 32.17% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPS.L has underperformed XLE with an annualized return of 7.33%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.22% annualized return.


MLPS.L

1D
1.18%
1M
0.77%
YTD
19.52%
6M
16.56%
1Y
16.47%
3Y*
19.21%
5Y*
17.43%
10Y*
7.33%

XLE

1D
1.29%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
32.17%
6M
29.80%
1Y
45.00%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
20.44%
10Y*
10.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPS.L vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPS.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF
19.52%2.44%22.62%19.38%31.92%36.78%-31.20%7.20%-14.89%-8.69%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
32.17%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPS.L and XLE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2013

0.48

The correlation between MLPS.L and XLE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

MLPS.L vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MLPS.L
XLE

Energy

96.7%
100.0%

Utilities

3.2%

-

Industrials

0.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Energy

MLPS.L
96.7%
XLE
100.0%

Utilities

MLPS.L
3.2%
XLE

-

Industrials

MLPS.L
0.2%
XLE

-

Basic Materials

MLPS.L

-

XLE

-

Communication Services

MLPS.L

-

XLE

-

Consumer Cyclical

MLPS.L

-

XLE

-

Consumer Defensive

MLPS.L

-

XLE

-

Financial Services

MLPS.L

-

XLE

-

Healthcare

MLPS.L

-

XLE

-

Real Estate

MLPS.L

-

XLE

-

Technology

MLPS.L

-

XLE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPS.L vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPS.L
MLPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MLPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPS.L vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPS.L) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPS.LXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.35

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

3.75

-1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.03

10.92

-5.89

MLPS.L vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPS.L and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPS.LXLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

2.21

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.79

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.35

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.31

-0.16

Drawdowns

MLPS.L vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPS.L drawdown since its inception was -82.23%, which is greater than XLE's maximum drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPS.L and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPS.LXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.23%

-71.26%

-10.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.45%

-12.05%

+3.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.67%

-20.14%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.76%

-26.04%

+4.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.70%

-66.81%

-8.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.66%

-6.15%

+3.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.26%

-17.98%

-10.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

4.14%

-0.87%

Volatility

MLPS.L vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPS.L) is 5.27%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 8.25%. This indicates that MLPS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPS.LXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

8.25%

-2.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.77%

16.58%

-5.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.14%

20.53%

-6.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.41%

26.02%

-5.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.54%

29.59%

-1.05%

MLPS.L vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPS.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPS.L vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

MLPS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPS.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.54%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPS.L and XLE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MLPS.L.

MLPS.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MLPS.L and 0.08% for XLE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPS.L and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer