MLPNX vs. GAGEX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MLPNX (Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund) and GAGEX (Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MLPNX returned 10.21%/yr vs 6.67%/yr for GAGEX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MLPNX charges 1.34%/yr vs 1.46%/yr for GAGEX.

Performance

MLPNX vs. GAGEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund (MLPNX) and Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund (GAGEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MLPNX having a 23.08% return and GAGEX slightly higher at 23.97%. Over the past 10 years, MLPNX has outperformed GAGEX with an annualized return of 10.21%, while GAGEX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.67% annualized return.

MLPNX

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: -6.81%
• YTD: 23.08%
• 6M: 23.08%
• 1Y: 26.76%
• 3Y*: 31.65%
• 5Y*: 26.07%
• 10Y*: 10.21%

GAGEX

• 1D: 1.44%
• 1M: -9.35%
• YTD: 23.97%
• 6M: 25.20%
• 1Y: 36.02%
• 3Y*: 16.60%
• 5Y*: 15.70%
• 10Y*: 6.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPNX vs. GAGEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MLPNX Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund	23.08%	4.56%	47.50%	25.29%	38.54%	55.22%	-45.69%	8.98%	-20.95%	-0.65%
GAGEX Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund	23.97%	16.88%	-1.75%	2.66%	34.32%	45.96%	-34.12%	10.45%	-18.96%	-1.04%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPNX and GAGEX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2011	0.68

The correlation between MLPNX and GAGEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MLPNX vs. GAGEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPNX

MLPNX Risk / Return Rank: 38
MLPNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
MLPNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
MLPNX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
MLPNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
MLPNX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

GAGEX

GAGEX Risk / Return Rank: 42
GAGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
GAGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
GAGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
GAGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
GAGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPNX vs. GAGEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund (MLPNX) and Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund (GAGEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MLPNX	GAGEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	1.75	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	2.31	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.29	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.86	2.51	+0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.42	10.13	-2.71

MLPNX vs. GAGEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the GAGEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPNX and GAGEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MLPNX vs. GAGEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPNX drawdown since its inception was -87.31%, which is greater than GAGEX's maximum drawdown of -78.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPNX and GAGEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPNX	GAGEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.31%	-78.90%	-8.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.89%	-13.16%	+4.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.58%	-23.67%	+4.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.27%	-26.42%	-0.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-83.59%	-69.98%	-13.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.48%	-11.91%	+4.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.43%	-29.17%	+3.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.41%	3.30%	+0.11%

Volatility

MLPNX vs. GAGEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund (MLPNX) is 5.92%, while Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund (GAGEX) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that MLPNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAGEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLPNX	GAGEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.92%	6.66%	-0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.21%	15.54%	-3.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.48%	18.96%	-2.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.00%	23.65%	+1.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.76%	27.30%	+8.46%

MLPNX vs. GAGEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPNX has a 1.34% expense ratio, which is lower than GAGEX's 1.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPNX vs. GAGEX - Dividend Comparison

MLPNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than GAGEX's 2.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GAGEX Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund	2.28%	2.82%	7.08%	4.33%	0.15%	2.59%	3.59%	1.91%	1.72%	1.40%	1.13%	1.33%
MLPNX Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund	4.71%	5.31%	4.14%	5.58%	6.44%	8.34%	21.57%	13.90%	13.34%	20.56%	7.75%	9.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPNX and GAGEX in my portfolio?

MLPNX and GAGEX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MLPNX or GAGEX?

GAGEX has higher volatility (6.66%) compared to MLPNX (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPNX dropped -87.31% vs GAGEX's -78.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GAGEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.