MLPIX vs. HWMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund (MLPIX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX).
MLPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Sep 4, 2001. HWMIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Jan 2, 1997.
Performance
MLPIX vs. HWMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MLPIX vs. HWMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPIX ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund | -1.69% | 5.48% | 9.65% | 13.32% | -8.61% | 28.23% | 1.85% | 24.02% | -13.08% | 10.45% |
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 5.14% | 7.87% | 3.62% | 19.87% | 1.63% | 39.18% | 0.49% | 12.97% | -19.32% | 7.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPIX achieves a -1.69% return, which is significantly lower than HWMIX's 5.14% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPIX has underperformed HWMIX with an annualized return of 7.93%, while HWMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.92% annualized return.
MLPIX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -7.49%
- YTD
- -1.69%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- 8.51%
- 3Y*
- 8.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.09%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
HWMIX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -3.40%
- YTD
- 5.14%
- 6M
- 7.65%
- 1Y
- 20.19%
- 3Y*
- 11.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.65%
- 10Y*
- 8.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLPIX vs. HWMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPIX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than HWMIX's 1.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MLPIX vs. HWMIX — Risk / Return Rank
MLPIX
HWMIX
MLPIX vs. HWMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund (MLPIX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLPIX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.44 | 0.88 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.76 | 1.36 | -0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.20 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | 1.11 | -0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.83 | 4.53 | -2.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPIX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 0.88 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.43 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.35 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.47 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPIX and HWMIX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MLPIX vs. HWMIX - Dividend Comparison
MLPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than HWMIX's 1.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPIX ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund | 0.48% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.89% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 3.92% | 10.95% | 0.56% | 0.00% |
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 1.32% | 1.39% | 1.15% | 0.28% | 0.49% | 1.28% | 2.25% | 1.60% | 2.99% | 6.72% | 1.53% | 14.67% |
Drawdowns
MLPIX vs. HWMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPIX drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, smaller than the maximum HWMIX drawdown of -69.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPIX and HWMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPIX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.11% | -69.84% | +9.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.49% | -16.87% | +2.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.24% | -25.90% | +2.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.96% | -63.21% | +17.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.87% | -4.77% | -5.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.42% | -10.89% | +1.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.87% | 4.14% | -0.27% |
Volatility
MLPIX vs. HWMIX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund (MLPIX) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) at 3.97%. This indicates that MLPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MLPIX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.64% | 3.97% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.10% | 12.35% | -1.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.45% | 23.86% | -3.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.55% | 22.33% | -2.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.38% | 25.61% | -4.23% |