MLPIX vs. CISMX
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund (MLPIX) and Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX).
MLPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Sep 4, 2001. CISMX is managed by Clarkston Funds. It was launched on Sep 15, 2015.
Performance
MLPIX vs. CISMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MLPIX vs. CISMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPIX ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund | -1.69% | 5.48% | 9.65% | 13.32% | -8.61% | 28.23% | 1.85% | 24.02% | -13.08% | 10.45% |
CISMX Clarkston Partners Fund | -4.68% | -8.37% | 4.49% | 6.41% | -0.40% | 7.94% | 17.42% | 23.98% | -7.25% | 12.84% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPIX achieves a -1.69% return, which is significantly higher than CISMX's -4.68% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPIX has outperformed CISMX with an annualized return of 7.93%, while CISMX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.84% annualized return.
MLPIX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -7.49%
- YTD
- -1.69%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- 8.51%
- 3Y*
- 8.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.09%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
CISMX
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -8.24%
- YTD
- -4.68%
- 6M
- -5.79%
- 1Y
- -7.11%
- 3Y*
- -0.97%
- 5Y*
- -1.61%
- 10Y*
- 5.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLPIX vs. CISMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPIX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than CISMX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MLPIX vs. CISMX — Risk / Return Rank
MLPIX
CISMX
MLPIX vs. CISMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund (MLPIX) and Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLPIX | CISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.44 | -0.35 | +0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.76 | -0.40 | +1.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 0.95 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | -0.71 | +1.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.83 | -1.71 | +3.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPIX | CISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | -0.35 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | -0.09 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.32 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.34 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPIX and CISMX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MLPIX vs. CISMX - Dividend Comparison
MLPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than CISMX's 4.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPIX ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund | 0.48% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.89% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 3.92% | 10.95% | 0.56% | 0.00% |
CISMX Clarkston Partners Fund | 4.88% | 4.65% | 1.05% | 3.76% | 16.95% | 0.81% | 3.73% | 3.79% | 7.15% | 1.30% | 1.17% | 0.09% |
Drawdowns
MLPIX vs. CISMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPIX drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, which is greater than CISMX's maximum drawdown of -33.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPIX and CISMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPIX | CISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.11% | -33.80% | -26.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.49% | -11.26% | -3.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.24% | -21.19% | -2.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.96% | -33.80% | -12.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.87% | -18.41% | +8.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.42% | -6.55% | -2.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.87% | 4.67% | -0.80% |
Volatility
MLPIX vs. CISMX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund (MLPIX) and Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX) have volatilities of 4.64% and 4.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MLPIX | CISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.64% | 4.82% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.10% | 12.44% | -1.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.45% | 19.82% | +0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.55% | 17.36% | +2.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.38% | 18.21% | +3.17% |