MLPI vs. SPY
MLPI (Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Neos, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. MLPI is actively managed, while SPY is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. MLPI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
MLPI vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPI achieves a 17.58% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 10.91% return.
MLPI
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -3.13%
- YTD
- 17.58%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
MLPI vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF | 17.58% | 0.56% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 1.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPI and SPY is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPI vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
MLPI
SPY
MLPI vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPI | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.49 | 0.59 | +2.90 |
Drawdowns
MLPI vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPI drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPI and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPI | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -55.19% | +49.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.84% | -0.70% | -3.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.27% | -9.05% | +7.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.91% | — |
Volatility
MLPI vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPI | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.05% | 11.83% | +1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.05% | 17.05% | -4.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.05% | 17.94% | -4.89% |
MLPI vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPI vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
MLPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.04%, more than SPY's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF | 6.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MLPI and SPY have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MLPI.
MLPI has the higher dividend yield at 6.04%, compared with 0.98% for SPY.
MLPI is categorized as Energy Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Neos and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MLPI and 0.09% for SPY.
Find the right allocation for MLPI and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer