MLPI vs. LCLG

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

MLPI (NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF) and LCLG (Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPI is a MLPs fund actively managed by NEOS, while LCLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Logan. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.30, they often move in opposite directions. MLPI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for LCLG.

Performance

MLPI vs. LCLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI) and Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF (LCLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPI achieves a 20.53% return, which is significantly higher than LCLG's 15.43% return.

MLPI

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 1.14%
• 6M: 21.89%
• YTD: 20.53%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LCLG

• 1D: -1.74%
• 1M: -1.27%
• 6M: 10.73%
• YTD: 15.43%
• 1Y: 28.43%
• 3Y*: 25.43%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPI vs. LCLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MLPI NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	20.53%	0.36%
LCLG Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF	15.43%	1.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPI and LCLG is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025	-0.30

Return for Risk

MLPI vs. LCLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LCLG

LCLG Risk / Return Rank: 52
LCLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
LCLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
LCLG Omega Ratio Rank: 48
LCLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
LCLG Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPI vs. LCLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI) and Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF (LCLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MLPI	LCLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.43	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.98	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.25	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.08	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.14	—

Drawdowns

MLPI vs. LCLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPI drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum LCLG drawdown of -25.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPI and LCLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPI	LCLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.38%	-25.79%	+20.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.75%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.42%	-4.60%	+3.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.59%	-4.42%	+2.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.50%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MLPI	LCLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.74%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	16.53%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.34%	20.08%	-6.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.34%	21.76%	-8.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.34%	21.76%	-8.42%

MLPI vs. LCLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than LCLG's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPI vs. LCLG - Dividend Comparison

MLPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.14%, while LCLG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
LCLG Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.97%	2.03%
MLPI NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	7.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPI and LCLG in my portfolio?

MLPI and LCLG have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MLPI or LCLG?

On fees, MLPI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MLPI or LCLG?

MLPI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for LCLG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MLPI or LCLG?

MLPI has the higher dividend yield at 7.14%, compared with 0.00% for LCLG.

What is the main difference between MLPI and LCLG?

MLPI is categorized as MLPs, while LCLG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: NEOS and Logan. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MLPI and 0.99% for LCLG.