PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPI vs. GXPE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPI vs. GXPE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI) and Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPI achieves a 17.58% return, which is significantly lower than GXPE's 31.18% return.


MLPI

1D
0.04%
1M
-3.13%
YTD
17.58%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GXPE

1D
1.65%
1M
-1.13%
YTD
31.18%
6M
29.39%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPI vs. GXPE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MLPI and GXPE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025

0.67

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPI vs. GXPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI) and Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MLPI vs. GXPE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPIGXPEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.49

2.18

+1.31

Drawdowns

MLPI vs. GXPE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPI drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum GXPE drawdown of -12.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPI and GXPE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPIGXPEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-12.37%

+6.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.84%

-6.88%

+3.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.27%

-3.21%

+1.94%

Volatility

MLPI vs. GXPE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPIGXPEDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.05%

20.42%

-7.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.05%

20.42%

-7.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.05%

20.42%

-7.37%

MLPI vs. GXPE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPI vs. GXPE - Dividend Comparison

MLPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.04%, more than GXPE's 0.92% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


MLPI and GXPE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXPE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXPE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MLPI.

MLPI has the higher dividend yield at 6.04%, compared with 0.92% for GXPE.

They also come from different issuers: Neos and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MLPI and 0.15% for GXPE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPI and GXPE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer