PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPDX vs. ACEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPDX vs. ACEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund Class A (MLPDX) and Invesco Equity and Income Fund (ACEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPDX achieves a 19.67% return, which is significantly higher than ACEIX's 6.02% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPDX has outperformed ACEIX with an annualized return of 9.87%, while ACEIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.87% annualized return.


MLPDX

1D
0.88%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
19.67%
6M
18.47%
1Y
23.06%
3Y*
22.12%
5Y*
18.92%
10Y*
9.87%

ACEIX

1D
0.61%
1M
1.13%
YTD
6.02%
6M
7.12%
1Y
17.83%
3Y*
13.49%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*
8.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPDX vs. ACEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPDX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund Class A
19.67%7.69%24.00%20.32%25.11%44.69%-25.75%18.07%-13.12%-8.61%
ACEIX
Invesco Equity and Income Fund
6.02%12.85%11.77%10.08%-7.75%18.02%9.96%19.17%-9.74%10.86%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPDX and ACEIX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2010

0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between MLPDX and ACEIX has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPDX vs. ACEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPDX
MLPDX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
MLPDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

ACEIX
ACEIX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ACEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ACEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPDX vs. ACEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund Class A (MLPDX) and Invesco Equity and Income Fund (ACEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPDXACEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.43

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.05

3.42

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.88

14.15

-1.27

MLPDX vs. ACEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the ACEIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPDX and ACEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPDXACEIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.34

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

0.64

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.69

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.72

-0.40

Drawdowns

MLPDX vs. ACEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPDX drawdown since its inception was -77.09%, which is greater than ACEIX's maximum drawdown of -40.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPDX and ACEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPDXACEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.09%

-40.08%

-37.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.10%

-5.50%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.45%

-12.40%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.98%

-16.73%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.90%

-30.80%

-42.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.44%

-0.17%

-4.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.40%

-4.61%

-8.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.32%

+0.59%

Volatility

MLPDX vs. ACEIX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund Class A (MLPDX) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to Invesco Equity and Income Fund (ACEIX) at 2.05%. This indicates that MLPDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPDXACEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.95%

2.05%

+2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.83%

6.13%

+2.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.67%

8.03%

+3.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.42%

11.11%

+6.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.76%

12.83%

+12.93%

MLPDX vs. ACEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPDX has a 9.02% expense ratio, which is higher than ACEIX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPDX vs. ACEIX - Dividend Comparison

MLPDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.62%, more than ACEIX's 6.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACEIX
Invesco Equity and Income Fund
6.51%6.87%8.28%6.91%6.65%13.74%2.94%5.53%8.91%6.73%3.94%5.17%
MLPDX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund Class A
6.62%7.51%6.42%7.72%8.49%9.74%17.44%17.48%13.70%10.99%10.00%11.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPDX and ACEIX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLPDX has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to ACEIX (2.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPDX dropped -77.09% vs ACEIX's -40.08%.

ACEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPDX and ACEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer