PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPD.L vs. XSLR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPD.L vs. XSLR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) and Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPD.L achieves a 19.38% return, which is significantly higher than XSLR.L's 2.41% return.


MLPD.L

1D
1.11%
1M
0.78%
YTD
19.38%
6M
16.54%
1Y
16.43%
3Y*
19.18%
5Y*
17.42%
10Y*
7.30%

XSLR.L

1D
-3.30%
1M
-3.04%
YTD
2.41%
6M
25.05%
1Y
112.50%
3Y*
45.43%
5Y*
21.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPD.L vs. XSLR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MLPD.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)
19.38%2.33%22.53%19.70%31.84%36.86%13.73%
XSLR.L
Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities
2.41%147.42%21.28%-0.78%3.55%-13.23%73.88%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPD.L and XSLR.L is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2020

0.19

The correlation between MLPD.L and XSLR.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPD.L vs. XSLR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPD.L
MLPD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
MLPD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

XSLR.L
XSLR.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
XSLR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSLR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSLR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
XSLR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSLR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPD.L vs. XSLR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) and Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPD.LXSLR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.35

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

2.74

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.95

6.02

-1.07

MLPD.L vs. XSLR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the XSLR.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPD.L and XSLR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPD.LXSLR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

2.00

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.60

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.83

-0.68

Drawdowns

MLPD.L vs. XSLR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPD.L drawdown since its inception was -82.22%, which is greater than XSLR.L's maximum drawdown of -40.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPD.L and XSLR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPD.LXSLR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.22%

-40.77%

-41.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.49%

-40.77%

+32.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.23%

-40.77%

+23.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.78%

-40.77%

+18.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.71%

-35.69%

+32.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.24%

-14.88%

-13.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

18.62%

-15.31%

Volatility

MLPD.L vs. XSLR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) is 5.23%, while Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.L) has a volatility of 17.67%. This indicates that MLPD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSLR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPD.LXSLR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

17.67%

-12.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.96%

53.52%

-42.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.23%

55.91%

-41.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.38%

35.24%

-14.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.35%

35.17%

-6.82%

MLPD.L vs. XSLR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPD.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XSLR.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPD.L vs. XSLR.L - Dividend Comparison

MLPD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.53%, while XSLR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPD.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)
7.53%8.21%8.18%8.60%7.98%8.57%11.03%10.06%9.87%8.15%8.14%9.96%
XSLR.L
Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPD.L and XSLR.L have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSLR.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSLR.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MLPD.L.

MLPD.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while XSLR.L is Silver. MLPD.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while XSLR.L tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MLPD.L and 0.20% for XSLR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPD.L and XSLR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer