PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPD.L vs. MLPP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPD.L vs. MLPP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) and Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MLPD.L is traded in USD, while MLPP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MLPP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MLPD.L having a 19.38% return and MLPP.L slightly higher at 19.40%. Over the past 10 years, MLPD.L has outperformed MLPP.L with an annualized return of 7.30%, while MLPP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 3.54% annualized return.


MLPD.L

1D
1.11%
1M
0.78%
YTD
19.38%
6M
16.54%
1Y
16.43%
3Y*
19.18%
5Y*
17.42%
10Y*
7.30%

MLPP.L

1D
1.16%
1M
1.15%
YTD
19.40%
6M
16.38%
1Y
16.39%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
17.43%
10Y*
3.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPD.L vs. MLPP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPD.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)
19.38%2.33%22.53%19.70%31.84%36.86%-31.37%7.22%-14.92%-8.67%
MLPP.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)
19.40%2.57%22.29%19.31%31.72%37.25%-36.03%0.36%-21.51%-15.73%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPD.L and MLPP.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2013

0.79

The correlation between MLPD.L and MLPP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.94 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MLPD.L vs. MLPP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MLPD.L
MLPP.L

Energy

96.7%
96.7%

Utilities

3.2%
3.2%

Industrials

0.2%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Energy

MLPD.L
96.7%
MLPP.L
96.7%

Utilities

MLPD.L
3.2%
MLPP.L
3.2%

Industrials

MLPD.L
0.2%
MLPP.L
0.2%

Basic Materials

MLPD.L

-

MLPP.L

-

Communication Services

MLPD.L

-

MLPP.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

MLPD.L

-

MLPP.L

-

Consumer Defensive

MLPD.L

-

MLPP.L

-

Financial Services

MLPD.L

-

MLPP.L

-

Healthcare

MLPD.L

-

MLPP.L

-

Real Estate

MLPD.L

-

MLPP.L

-

Technology

MLPD.L

-

MLPP.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPD.L vs. MLPP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPD.L
MLPD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
MLPD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPP.L
MLPP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
MLPP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPD.L vs. MLPP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) and Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPD.LMLPP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.19

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

2.04

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.95

5.16

-0.21

MLPD.L vs. MLPP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the MLPP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPD.L and MLPP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPD.LMLPP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

1.07

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.91

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.13

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

-0.04

+0.19

Drawdowns

MLPD.L vs. MLPP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPD.L drawdown since its inception was -82.22%, smaller than the maximum MLPP.L drawdown of -88.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPD.L and MLPP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPD.LMLPP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.22%

-88.93%

+6.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.49%

-8.01%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.23%

-17.53%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.78%

-20.16%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.74%

-81.66%

+5.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.71%

-23.01%

+20.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.24%

-47.07%

+18.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

3.17%

+0.14%

Volatility

MLPD.L vs. MLPP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) is 5.23%, while Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPP.L) has a volatility of 5.95%. This indicates that MLPD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPD.LMLPP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

5.95%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.96%

12.18%

-1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.23%

15.21%

-0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.38%

21.59%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.35%

32.87%

-4.52%

MLPD.L vs. MLPP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MLPD.L and MLPP.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

MLPD.L vs. MLPP.L - Dividend Comparison

MLPD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.53%, which matches MLPP.L's 7.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPD.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)
7.53%8.21%8.18%8.60%7.98%8.57%11.03%10.06%9.87%8.15%8.14%9.96%
MLPP.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)
7.51%8.28%7.99%8.81%7.86%8.40%6.01%0.13%0.13%0.11%0.10%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, MLPD.L and MLPP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MLPD.L and MLPP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Energy NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPD.L and MLPP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer