PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MLPD.L vs. INRG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MLPD.L vs. INRG.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MLPD.L (Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)) and INRG.L (iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Energy Equities funds - MLPD.L tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD while INRG.L tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MLPD.L returned 7.30%/yr vs 12.19%/yr for INRG.L. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MLPD.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for INRG.L.

Performance

MLPD.L vs. INRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MLPD.L is traded in USD, while INRG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the INRG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPD.L achieves a 19.38% return, which is significantly lower than INRG.L's 41.61% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPD.L has underperformed INRG.L with an annualized return of 7.30%, while INRG.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.19% annualized return.

MLPD.L

1D
1.11%
1M
0.78%
YTD
19.38%
6M
16.54%
1Y
16.43%
3Y*
19.18%
5Y*
17.42%
10Y*
7.30%

INRG.L

1D
-1.41%
1M
11.59%
YTD
41.61%
6M
40.85%
1Y
85.40%
3Y*
9.24%
5Y*
2.06%
10Y*
12.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPD.L vs. INRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPD.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)		19.38%2.33%22.53%19.70%31.84%36.86%-31.37%7.22%-14.92%-8.67%
INRG.L
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		41.61%44.92%-25.65%-19.82%-5.76%-24.40%142.43%44.80%-8.17%20.98%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPD.L and INRG.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2013

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between MLPD.L and INRG.L has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MLPD.L vs. INRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MLPD.L
INRG.L

Energy

96.7%
24.7%

Utilities

3.2%
33.7%

Industrials

0.2%
28.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.3%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

10.5%

Energy

MLPD.L
96.7%
INRG.L
24.7%

Utilities

MLPD.L
3.2%
INRG.L
33.7%

Industrials

MLPD.L
0.2%
INRG.L
28.3%

Basic Materials

MLPD.L

-

INRG.L
1.3%

Communication Services

MLPD.L

-

INRG.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

MLPD.L

-

INRG.L
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

MLPD.L

-

INRG.L

-

Financial Services

MLPD.L

-

INRG.L

-

Healthcare

MLPD.L

-

INRG.L

-

Real Estate

MLPD.L

-

INRG.L

-

Technology

MLPD.L

-

INRG.L
10.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)

iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

Often compared with MLPD.L:
MLPD.L vs. MLPXMLPD.L vs. MLPAMLPD.L vs. TDIV.ASMLPD.L vs. EIPIXMLPD.L vs. JEPQMLPD.L vs. QYLDMLPD.L vs. MAIN
Often compared with INRG.L:
INRG.L vs. ICLNINRG.L vs. TANINRG.L vs. RENW.DEINRG.L vs. V3AB.LINRG.L vs. ACESINRG.L vs. WDNR.DEINRG.L vs. ESIH.L

Return for Risk

MLPD.L vs. INRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MLPD.L
MLPD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
MLPD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
INRG.L
INRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
INRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
INRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
INRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
INRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPD.L vs. INRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

MLPD.LINRG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.15
3.40

-2.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.62
4.28

-2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.51

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

7.54

-5.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.95

22.70

-17.75

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MLPD.L vs. INRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the INRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPD.L and INRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

MLPD.LINRG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

3.40

-2.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.08

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.46

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

-0.05

+0.20

Drawdowns

MLPD.L vs. INRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPD.L drawdown since its inception was -82.22%, smaller than the maximum INRG.L drawdown of -88.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPD.L and INRG.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MLPD.LINRG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.22%

-88.36%

+6.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.49%

-11.27%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.23%

-43.89%

+26.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.78%

-57.21%

+35.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.74%

-67.38%

-8.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.71%

-40.67%

+37.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.24%

-66.31%

+38.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

3.75%

-0.44%

Volatility

MLPD.L vs. INRG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) is 5.23%, while iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L) has a volatility of 9.58%. This indicates that MLPD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MLPD.LINRG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

9.58%

-4.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.96%

18.48%

-7.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.23%

24.98%

-10.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.38%

26.70%

-6.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.35%

26.61%

+1.74%

MLPD.L vs. INRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPD.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than INRG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPD.L vs. INRG.L - Dividend Comparison

MLPD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.53%, more than INRG.L's 1.07% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INRG.L
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		1.07%1.77%1.58%1.00%0.62%1.01%0.61%2.05%3.68%3.69%3.65%3.90%
MLPD.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)		7.53%8.21%8.18%8.60%7.98%8.57%11.03%10.06%9.87%8.15%8.14%9.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

MLPD.L and INRG.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MLPD.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MLPD.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INRG.L.

MLPD.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while INRG.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MLPD.L and 0.65% for INRG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPD.L and INRG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer