PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPD.L vs. GCED.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPD.L vs. GCED.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) and Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (GCED.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPD.L achieves a 19.38% return, which is significantly lower than GCED.L's 37.24% return.


MLPD.L

1D
1.11%
1M
0.78%
YTD
19.38%
6M
16.54%
1Y
16.43%
3Y*
19.18%
5Y*
17.42%
10Y*
7.30%

GCED.L

1D
-0.94%
1M
5.79%
YTD
37.24%
6M
40.01%
1Y
90.71%
3Y*
8.32%
5Y*
-4.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPD.L vs. GCED.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MLPD.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)
19.38%2.33%22.53%19.70%31.84%12.36%
GCED.L
Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist
37.24%41.92%-26.55%-10.54%-30.72%-22.60%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPD.L and GCED.L is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2021

0.37

The correlation between MLPD.L and GCED.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MLPD.L vs. GCED.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MLPD.L
GCED.L

Energy

96.7%
13.0%

Utilities

3.2%
16.2%

Industrials

0.2%
48.1%

Basic Materials

-

3.4%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.9%

Financial Services

-

0.9%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

6.8%

Energy

MLPD.L
96.7%
GCED.L
13.0%

Utilities

MLPD.L
3.2%
GCED.L
16.2%

Industrials

MLPD.L
0.2%
GCED.L
48.1%

Basic Materials

MLPD.L

-

GCED.L
3.4%

Communication Services

MLPD.L

-

GCED.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

MLPD.L

-

GCED.L
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

MLPD.L

-

GCED.L
0.9%

Financial Services

MLPD.L

-

GCED.L
0.9%

Healthcare

MLPD.L

-

GCED.L

-

Real Estate

MLPD.L

-

GCED.L

-

Technology

MLPD.L

-

GCED.L
6.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPD.L vs. GCED.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPD.L
MLPD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
MLPD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

GCED.L
GCED.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
GCED.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCED.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCED.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
GCED.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCED.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPD.L vs. GCED.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) and Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (GCED.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPD.LGCED.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.60

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

7.95

-6.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.95

26.76

-21.81

MLPD.L vs. GCED.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the GCED.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPD.L and GCED.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPD.LGCED.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

3.95

-2.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

-0.15

+1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

-0.24

+0.39

Drawdowns

MLPD.L vs. GCED.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPD.L drawdown since its inception was -82.22%, which is greater than GCED.L's maximum drawdown of -72.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPD.L and GCED.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPD.LGCED.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.22%

-72.10%

-10.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.49%

-11.35%

+2.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.23%

-53.20%

+35.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.78%

-69.88%

+48.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.71%

-31.37%

+28.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.24%

-44.84%

+16.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

3.38%

-0.07%

Volatility

MLPD.L vs. GCED.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) is 5.23%, while Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (GCED.L) has a volatility of 9.32%. This indicates that MLPD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCED.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPD.LGCED.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

9.32%

-4.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.96%

16.02%

-5.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.23%

22.90%

-8.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.38%

28.32%

-7.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.35%

28.88%

-0.53%

MLPD.L vs. GCED.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPD.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GCED.L's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPD.L vs. GCED.L - Dividend Comparison

MLPD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.53%, more than GCED.L's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCED.L
Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist
1.51%2.09%1.43%0.68%0.09%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MLPD.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)
7.53%8.21%8.18%8.60%7.98%8.57%11.03%10.06%9.87%8.15%8.14%9.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPD.L and GCED.L have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MLPD.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MLPD.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCED.L.

MLPD.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while GCED.L tracks WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MLPD.L and 0.60% for GCED.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPD.L and GCED.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer