MLPD.L vs. FWRA.L
MLPD.L (Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)) and FWRA.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPD.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while FWRA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MLPD.L returned 16.43% vs 29.69% for FWRA.L. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MLPD.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FWRA.L.
Performance
MLPD.L vs. FWRA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPD.L achieves a 19.38% return, which is significantly higher than FWRA.L's 11.73% return.
MLPD.L
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 19.38%
- 6M
- 16.54%
- 1Y
- 16.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.18%
- 5Y*
- 17.42%
- 10Y*
- 7.30%
FWRA.L
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 4.86%
- YTD
- 11.73%
- 6M
- 13.36%
- 1Y
- 29.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MLPD.L vs. FWRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPD.L Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) | 19.38% | 2.33% | 22.53% | 12.51% |
FWRA.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 11.73% | 22.37% | 18.07% | 9.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPD.L and FWRA.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023 | 0.28 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MLPD.L and FWRA.L has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
MLPD.L vs. FWRA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MLPD.L
FWRA.L
Energy
Utilities
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Energy
MLPD.L
FWRA.L
Utilities
MLPD.L
FWRA.L
Industrials
MLPD.L
FWRA.L
Basic Materials
MLPD.L
-
FWRA.L
Communication Services
MLPD.L
-
FWRA.L
Consumer Cyclical
MLPD.L
-
FWRA.L
Consumer Defensive
MLPD.L
-
FWRA.L
Financial Services
MLPD.L
-
FWRA.L
Healthcare
MLPD.L
-
FWRA.L
Real Estate
MLPD.L
-
FWRA.L
Technology
MLPD.L
-
FWRA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPD.L vs. FWRA.L — Risk / Return Rank
MLPD.L
FWRA.L
MLPD.L vs. FWRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLPD.L | FWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.44 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 3.37 | -1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.95 | 14.12 | -9.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPD.L | FWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 2.39 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 1.57 | -1.42 |
Drawdowns
MLPD.L vs. FWRA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPD.L drawdown since its inception was -82.22%, which is greater than FWRA.L's maximum drawdown of -16.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPD.L and FWRA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPD.L | FWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.22% | -16.60% | -65.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.49% | -8.74% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.71% | -0.65% | -2.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.24% | -1.93% | -26.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 2.09% | +1.22% |
Volatility
MLPD.L vs. FWRA.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) at 3.79%. This indicates that MLPD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FWRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPD.L | FWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.23% | 3.79% | +1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.96% | 9.86% | +1.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.23% | 12.33% | +1.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.38% | 13.53% | +6.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.35% | 13.53% | +14.82% |
MLPD.L vs. FWRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPD.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FWRA.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPD.L vs. FWRA.L - Dividend Comparison
MLPD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.53%, while FWRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWRA.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLPD.L Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) | 7.53% | 8.21% | 8.18% | 8.60% | 7.98% | 8.57% | 11.03% | 10.06% | 9.87% | 8.15% | 8.14% | 9.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MLPD.L and FWRA.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FWRA.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FWRA.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MLPD.L.
MLPD.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while FWRA.L is Global Equities. MLPD.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while FWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MLPD.L and 0.15% for FWRA.L.
Find the right allocation for MLPD.L and FWRA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer