MLPD.L vs. EQQQ.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MLPD.L (Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)) and EQQQ.L (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPD.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while EQQQ.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MLPD.L returned 7.30%/yr vs 21.72%/yr for EQQQ.L. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MLPD.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EQQQ.L.

Performance

MLPD.L vs. EQQQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

MLPD.L is traded in USD, while EQQQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EQQQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MLPD.L having a 19.38% return and EQQQ.L slightly higher at 20.33%. Over the past 10 years, MLPD.L has underperformed EQQQ.L with an annualized return of 7.30%, while EQQQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 21.72% annualized return.

MLPD.L

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: 0.78%
• YTD: 19.38%
• 6M: 16.54%
• 1Y: 16.43%
• 3Y*: 19.18%
• 5Y*: 17.42%
• 10Y*: 7.30%

EQQQ.L

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 10.67%
• YTD: 20.33%
• 6M: 19.52%
• 1Y: 41.70%
• 3Y*: 28.51%
• 5Y*: 17.77%
• 10Y*: 21.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPD.L vs. EQQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MLPD.L Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)	19.38%	2.33%	22.53%	19.70%	31.84%	36.86%	-31.37%	7.22%	-14.92%	-8.67%
EQQQ.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF	20.33%	19.96%	26.41%	55.59%	-33.50%	28.41%	47.71%	39.05%	-1.28%	31.55%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPD.L and EQQQ.L is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2013	0.30

The correlation between MLPD.L and EQQQ.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MLPD.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MLPD.L	EQQQ.L
Energy	96.7%	0.5%
Utilities	3.2%	1.2%
Industrials	0.2%	2.8%
Basic Materials	-	1.0%
Communication Services	-	14.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.6%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	3.7%
Real Estate	-	0.0%
Technology	-	57.9%

Return for Risk

MLPD.L vs. EQQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPD.L

MLPD.L Risk / Return Rank: 32
MLPD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
MLPD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
MLPD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 28
MLPD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
MLPD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 32

EQQQ.L

EQQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
EQQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
EQQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 83
EQQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
EQQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPD.L vs. EQQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MLPD.L	EQQQ.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	2.71	-1.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.62	3.70	-2.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.46	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.93	3.76	-1.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.95	13.86	-8.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MLPD.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPD.L and EQQQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MLPD.L	EQQQ.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.15	2.71	-1.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85	0.87	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26	1.09	-0.83
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	0.82	-0.67

Drawdowns

MLPD.L vs. EQQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPD.L drawdown since its inception was -82.22%, which is greater than EQQQ.L's maximum drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPD.L and EQQQ.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPD.L	EQQQ.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.22%	-50.98%	-31.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.49%	-11.03%	+2.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.23%	-22.63%	+5.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.78%	-35.27%	+13.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-75.74%	-35.27%	-40.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.71%	-0.08%	-2.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.24%	-7.06%	-21.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.31%	3.00%	+0.31%

Volatility

MLPD.L vs. EQQQ.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) at 4.18%. This indicates that MLPD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLPD.L	EQQQ.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.23%	4.18%	+1.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.96%	11.13%	-0.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.23%	15.36%	-1.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.38%	20.50%	-0.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.35%	19.85%	+8.50%

MLPD.L vs. EQQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPD.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EQQQ.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPD.L vs. EQQQ.L - Dividend Comparison

MLPD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.53%, more than EQQQ.L's 0.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EQQQ.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF	0.23%	0.29%	0.38%	0.39%	0.56%	0.25%	0.41%	0.56%	0.63%	0.67%	0.77%	0.72%
MLPD.L Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)	7.53%	8.21%	8.18%	8.60%	7.98%	8.57%	11.03%	10.06%	9.87%	8.15%	8.14%	9.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPD.L and EQQQ.L in my portfolio?

MLPD.L and EQQQ.L have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MLPD.L or EQQQ.L?

On fees, EQQQ.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MLPD.L or EQQQ.L?

EQQQ.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MLPD.L.

What is the main difference between MLPD.L and EQQQ.L?

MLPD.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while EQQQ.L is Nasdaq-100. MLPD.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while EQQQ.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MLPD.L and 0.30% for EQQQ.L.