PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPB vs. VBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPB vs. VBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) and Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPB achieves a 17.00% return, which is significantly higher than VBIL's 1.71% return.


MLPB

1D
2.04%
1M
-6.13%
YTD
17.00%
6M
16.53%
1Y
18.65%
3Y*
21.94%
5Y*
18.51%
10Y*
8.03%

VBIL

1D
0.01%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.71%
6M
1.81%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPB vs. VBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MLPB and VBIL is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2025

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPB vs. VBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPB
MLPB Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MLPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPB Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPB Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

VBIL
VBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
VBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
VBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPB vs. VBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) and Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MLPBVBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-16.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-109.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

39.66

-38.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

296.41

-294.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.43

1,960.46

-1,955.03

MLPB vs. VBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPB Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the VBIL Sharpe Ratio of 18.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPB and VBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MLPB vs. VBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPB drawdown since its inception was -71.93%, which is greater than VBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPB and VBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPBVBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.93%

-0.09%

-71.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-0.01%

-9.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.86%

0.00%

-6.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.78%

-0.00%

-14.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

0.00%

+3.44%

Volatility

MLPB vs. VBIL - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) has a higher volatility of 5.33% compared to Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that MLPB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPBVBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.33%

0.05%

+5.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.30%

0.16%

+10.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.70%

0.22%

+13.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.90%

0.30%

+19.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.16%

0.30%

+26.86%

MLPB vs. VBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VBIL's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPB vs. VBIL - Dividend Comparison

MLPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, more than VBIL's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MLPB
ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B
5.99%6.51%5.95%6.37%6.00%6.98%11.93%7.98%8.11%7.23%6.85%
VBIL
Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF
3.65%3.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPB and VBIL have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLPB has higher volatility (5.33%) compared to VBIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPB dropped -71.93% vs VBIL's -0.09%.

On 1-year performance, MLPB leads with 18.65% vs 3.91% for VBIL. On fees, VBIL is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MLPB has performed better with a 18.65% return vs 3.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBIL is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MLPB.

MLPB has the higher dividend yield at 5.99%, compared with 3.65% for VBIL.

MLPB is categorized as MLPs, while VBIL is Ultrashort Bond. MLPB tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while VBIL tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Bills 0-3 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MLPB and 0.07% for VBIL.

VBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.07 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPB and VBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer