MLPB vs. TMLP
MLPB (ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B) and TMLP (Tortoise MLP ETF) are both MLPs funds - MLPB tracks the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index while TMLP tracks the Tortoise MLP Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MLPB charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TMLP.
Performance
MLPB vs. TMLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPB achieves a 23.17% return, which is significantly higher than TMLP's 19.10% return.
MLPB
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- 6.90%
- 6M
- 16.96%
- YTD
- 23.17%
- 1Y
- 24.66%
- 3Y*
- 22.00%
- 5Y*
- 21.74%
- 10Y*
- 8.59%
TMLP
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- 5.56%
- 6M
- 15.90%
- YTD
- 19.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MLPB vs. TMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MLPB ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B | 23.17% | 0.33% |
TMLP Tortoise MLP ETF | 19.10% | 0.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPB and TMLP is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPB vs. TMLP — Risk / Return Rank
MLPB
TMLP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MLPB vs. TMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) and Tortoise MLP ETF (TMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MLPB | TMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.65 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MLPB vs. TMLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPB drawdown since its inception was -71.93%, which is greater than TMLP's maximum drawdown of -8.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPB and TMLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPB | TMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.93% | -8.55% | -63.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.95% | -2.63% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.72% | -2.21% | -12.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.72% | — | — |
Volatility
MLPB vs. TMLP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPB | TMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.60% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.27% | 14.50% | -0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 14.50% | +5.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.19% | 14.50% | +12.69% |
MLPB vs. TMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TMLP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPB vs. TMLP - Dividend Comparison
MLPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, more than TMLP's 3.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPB ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B | 5.86% | 6.51% | 5.95% | 6.37% | 6.00% | 6.98% | 11.93% | 7.98% | 8.11% | 7.23% | 6.85% |
TMLP Tortoise MLP ETF | 3.76% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, MLPB and TMLP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, TMLP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMLP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MLPB.
MLPB has the higher dividend yield at 5.86%, compared with 3.76% for TMLP.
MLPB tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while TMLP tracks Tortoise MLP Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MLPB and 0.50% for TMLP.
Find the right allocation for MLPB and TMLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer