PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPB vs. MLPA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPB vs. MLPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPB achieves a 19.72% return, which is significantly higher than MLPA's 16.07% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPB has outperformed MLPA with an annualized return of 10.20%, while MLPA has yielded a comparatively lower 6.22% annualized return.


MLPB

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
19.72%
6M
18.24%
1Y
20.60%
3Y*
22.21%
5Y*
19.42%
10Y*
10.20%

MLPA

1D
-0.31%
1M
-0.52%
YTD
16.07%
6M
14.82%
1Y
16.32%
3Y*
17.12%
5Y*
15.58%
10Y*
6.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPB vs. MLPA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPB
ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B
19.72%7.40%25.53%22.01%30.22%39.42%-30.80%5.69%-8.79%-9.71%
MLPA
Global X MLP ETF
16.07%5.73%20.35%15.93%27.03%39.64%-33.97%11.91%-15.71%-8.31%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPB and MLPA is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.76

The correlation between MLPB and MLPA shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.95 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPB vs. MLPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPB
MLPB Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
MLPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPB Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPB Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPA
MLPA Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MLPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPA Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPA Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPB vs. MLPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPBMLPADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.54

1.37

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.16

1.96

+0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.23

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

1.97

+0.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.60

5.99

+0.60

MLPB vs. MLPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPB Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the MLPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPB and MLPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPBMLPADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

1.37

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.86

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.23

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.16

+0.07

Drawdowns

MLPB vs. MLPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPB drawdown since its inception was -71.93%, smaller than the maximum MLPA drawdown of -78.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPB and MLPA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPBMLPADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.93%

-78.75%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-8.33%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.49%

-14.20%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.41%

-18.75%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.93%

-74.05%

+2.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.69%

-3.84%

-0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.83%

-20.27%

+5.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

2.73%

+0.40%

Volatility

MLPB vs. MLPA - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) at 4.50%. This indicates that MLPB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPBMLPADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

4.50%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.05%

8.47%

+1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.51%

12.00%

+1.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.03%

18.21%

+1.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.11%

27.47%

+0.64%

MLPB vs. MLPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPA's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPB vs. MLPA - Dividend Comparison

MLPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, less than MLPA's 7.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPA
Global X MLP ETF
7.28%7.82%7.25%7.49%7.30%8.72%13.84%9.09%10.00%8.05%7.15%9.29%
MLPB
ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B
5.85%6.51%5.95%6.37%6.00%6.98%11.93%7.98%8.11%7.23%6.85%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, MLPB and MLPA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MLPB has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to MLPA (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPB dropped -71.93% vs MLPA's -78.75%.

On 10-year performance, MLPB leads with 10.20% vs 6.22% for MLPA. On fees, MLPA is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, MLPA has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MLPB has performed better with a 10.20% return vs 6.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MLPA is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MLPB.

MLPA has the higher dividend yield at 7.28%, compared with 5.85% for MLPB.

MLPB tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while MLPA tracks Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MLPB and 0.46% for MLPA.

MLPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPB and MLPA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer