MLPB vs. EMLP
MLPB (ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B) and EMLP (First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund) are both MLPs funds. MLPB is passively managed, while EMLP is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, MLPB returned 10.21%/yr vs 10.24%/yr for EMLP. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MLPB charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for EMLP.
Performance
MLPB vs. EMLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPB achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly higher than EMLP's 14.62% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MLPB having a 10.21% annualized return and EMLP not far ahead at 10.24%.
MLPB
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 19.79%
- 6M
- 19.70%
- 1Y
- 22.49%
- 3Y*
- 22.24%
- 5Y*
- 19.55%
- 10Y*
- 10.21%
EMLP
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -3.08%
- YTD
- 14.62%
- 6M
- 13.20%
- 1Y
- 18.77%
- 3Y*
- 21.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.47%
- 10Y*
- 10.24%
MLPB vs. EMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPB ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B | 19.79% | 7.40% | 25.53% | 22.01% | 30.22% | 39.42% | -30.80% | 5.69% | -8.79% | -9.71% |
EMLP First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 14.62% | 9.67% | 33.39% | 8.05% | 10.39% | 23.20% | -13.36% | 23.40% | -8.70% | 1.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPB and EMLP is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.62 |
The correlation between MLPB and EMLP shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPB vs. EMLP — Risk / Return Rank
MLPB
EMLP
MLPB vs. EMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) and First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLPB | EMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 1.89 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.33 | 2.73 | -0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.32 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 3.82 | -1.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.55 | 12.42 | -4.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPB | EMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 1.89 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 1.07 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.58 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.57 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
MLPB vs. EMLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPB drawdown since its inception was -71.93%, which is greater than EMLP's maximum drawdown of -43.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPB and EMLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPB | EMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.93% | -43.61% | -28.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | -4.94% | -4.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.49% | -11.47% | -5.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.41% | -14.59% | -5.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.93% | -43.61% | -28.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.64% | -3.62% | -1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.83% | -5.76% | -9.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 1.52% | +1.60% |
Volatility
MLPB vs. EMLP - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) has a higher volatility of 5.43% compared to First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) at 4.10%. This indicates that MLPB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPB | EMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.43% | 4.10% | +1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.05% | 7.87% | +2.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.53% | 9.97% | +3.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.03% | 14.53% | +5.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.11% | 17.69% | +10.42% |
MLPB vs. EMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than EMLP's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPB vs. EMLP - Dividend Comparison
MLPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, more than EMLP's 2.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLP First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 2.79% | 3.18% | 3.19% | 3.92% | 3.15% | 3.29% | 4.70% | 3.71% | 4.71% | 3.80% | 3.62% | 4.63% |
MLPB ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B | 5.85% | 6.51% | 5.95% | 6.37% | 6.00% | 6.98% | 11.93% | 7.98% | 8.11% | 7.23% | 6.85% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MLPB and EMLP have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLPB has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to EMLP (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPB dropped -71.93% vs EMLP's -43.61%.
On 10-year performance, EMLP leads with 10.24% vs 10.21% for MLPB. On fees, MLPB is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, EMLP has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EMLP has performed better with a 10.24% return vs 10.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MLPB is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for EMLP.
MLPB has the higher dividend yield at 5.85%, compared with 2.79% for EMLP.
They also come from different issuers: UBS and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MLPB and 0.96% for EMLP.
EMLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLPB and EMLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer