MLPB vs. BDCX
MLPB (ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B) and BDCX (ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPB is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while BDCX is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Business Development Companies (150%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MLPB returned 19.42%/yr vs 1.39%/yr for BDCX. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MLPB charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BDCX.
Performance
MLPB vs. BDCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPB achieves a 19.72% return, which is significantly higher than BDCX's -12.50% return.
MLPB
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- YTD
- 19.72%
- 6M
- 18.24%
- 1Y
- 20.60%
- 3Y*
- 22.21%
- 5Y*
- 19.42%
- 10Y*
- 10.20%
BDCX
- 1D
- -4.22%
- 1M
- -11.22%
- YTD
- -12.50%
- 6M
- -14.12%
- 1Y
- -17.95%
- 3Y*
- 3.33%
- 5Y*
- 1.39%
- 10Y*
- —
MLPB vs. BDCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPB ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B | 19.72% | 7.40% | 25.53% | 22.01% | 30.22% | 39.42% | -3.79% |
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN | -12.50% | -10.42% | 15.32% | 35.33% | -17.67% | 52.70% | 24.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPB and BDCX is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MLPB and BDCX has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPB vs. BDCX — Risk / Return Rank
MLPB
BDCX
MLPB vs. BDCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLPB | BDCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.54 | -0.66 | +2.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.16 | -0.84 | +2.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.91 | +0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | -0.59 | +2.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.60 | -1.05 | +7.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPB | BDCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | -0.66 | +2.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 | 0.05 | +0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.43 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
MLPB vs. BDCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPB drawdown since its inception was -71.93%, which is greater than BDCX's maximum drawdown of -34.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPB and BDCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPB | BDCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.93% | -34.96% | -36.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | -30.46% | +20.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.49% | -33.39% | +16.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.41% | -34.96% | +14.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.69% | -28.88% | +24.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.83% | -10.07% | -4.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 17.14% | -14.01% |
Volatility
MLPB vs. BDCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) is 5.40%, while ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) has a volatility of 7.50%. This indicates that MLPB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPB | BDCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | 7.50% | -2.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.05% | 22.42% | -12.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.51% | 27.19% | -13.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.03% | 26.51% | -6.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.11% | 26.90% | +1.21% |
MLPB vs. BDCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BDCX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPB vs. BDCX - Dividend Comparison
MLPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, less than BDCX's 20.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN | 20.45% | 19.17% | 15.28% | 14.71% | 17.47% | 11.52% | 6.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLPB ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B | 5.85% | 6.51% | 5.95% | 6.37% | 6.00% | 6.98% | 11.93% | 7.98% | 8.11% | 7.23% | 6.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MLPB and BDCX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BDCX has higher volatility (7.50%) compared to MLPB (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPB dropped -71.93% vs BDCX's -34.96%.
On 5-year performance, MLPB leads with 19.42% vs 1.39% for BDCX. On fees, MLPB is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, MLPB has been the lower-risk option at 5.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MLPB has performed better with a 19.42% return vs 1.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MLPB is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BDCX.
BDCX has the higher dividend yield at 20.45%, compared with 5.85% for MLPB.
MLPB is categorized as MLPs, while BDCX is Leveraged Equities. MLPB tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while BDCX tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies (150%). Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MLPB and 0.95% for BDCX.
MLPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLPB and BDCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer