MLPB vs. AMND
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 (AMND).
MLPB and AMND are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MLPB is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Oct 8, 2015. AMND is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend Index. It was launched on Jul 15, 2020. Both MLPB and AMND are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
MLPB vs. AMND - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MLPB vs. AMND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPB ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B | 16.69% | 7.40% | 25.53% | 22.01% | 30.22% | 39.42% | 14.36% |
AMND ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 40.42% | 13.60% | 21.27% | 34.91% | 10.45% |
Returns By Period
MLPB
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 16.69%
- 6M
- 20.26%
- 1Y
- 11.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.94%
- 5Y*
- 23.10%
- 10Y*
- 9.55%
AMND
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLPB vs. AMND - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AMND's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MLPB vs. AMND — Risk / Return Rank
MLPB
AMND
MLPB vs. AMND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 (AMND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLPB | AMND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.64 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.93 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.69 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.81 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPB | AMND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | — | — |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPB and AMND is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MLPB vs. AMND - Dividend Comparison
MLPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, while AMND has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPB ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B | 5.83% | 6.51% | 5.95% | 6.37% | 6.00% | 6.98% | 11.93% | 7.98% | 8.11% | 7.23% | 6.85% |
AMND ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.14% | 6.56% | 6.37% | 7.10% | 2.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MLPB vs. AMND - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPB | AMND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.68% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.03% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.26% | — | — |
Volatility
MLPB vs. AMND - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MLPB | AMND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.96% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.75% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.14% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.10% | — | — |