MLPA vs. SIL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MLPA (Global X MLP ETF) and SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPA is a MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index, while SIL is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MLPA returned 6.04%/yr vs 8.64%/yr for SIL. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MLPA charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SIL.

Performance

MLPA vs. SIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPA achieves a 14.27% return, which is significantly higher than SIL's -5.97% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPA has underperformed SIL with an annualized return of 6.04%, while SIL has yielded a comparatively higher 8.64% annualized return.

MLPA

• 1D: 1.78%
• 1M: -4.45%
• YTD: 14.27%
• 6M: 14.04%
• 1Y: 15.23%
• 3Y*: 16.94%
• 5Y*: 14.82%
• 10Y*: 6.04%

SIL

• 1D: -5.47%
• 1M: -10.87%
• YTD: -5.97%
• 6M: -10.24%
• 1Y: 65.33%
• 3Y*: 47.37%
• 5Y*: 13.84%
• 10Y*: 8.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPA vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MLPA Global X MLP ETF	14.27%	5.73%	20.35%	15.93%	27.03%	39.64%	-33.97%	11.91%	-15.71%	-8.31%
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	-5.97%	166.16%	14.62%	1.31%	-22.83%	-18.35%	40.30%	34.78%	-22.42%	1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPA and SIL is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2012	0.22

The correlation between MLPA and SIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MLPA vs. SIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MLPA	SIL
Energy	96.8%	-
Utilities	3.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	99.8%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	0.2%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

MLPA vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPA

MLPA Risk / Return Rank: 36
MLPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
MLPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
MLPA Omega Ratio Rank: 33
MLPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
MLPA Martin Ratio Rank: 36

SIL

SIL Risk / Return Rank: 35
SIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
SIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
SIL Omega Ratio Rank: 35
SIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
SIL Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPA vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MLPA	SIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	1.25	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	1.69	+0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.23	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	1.77	+0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.17	4.50	+0.67

MLPA vs. SIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPA Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the SIL Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPA and SIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MLPA vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPA drawdown since its inception was -78.75%, smaller than the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPA and SIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPA	SIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.75%	-82.99%	+4.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.33%	-37.08%	+28.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.20%	-37.08%	+22.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.75%	-49.48%	+30.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-74.05%	-63.04%	-11.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.33%	-33.47%	+28.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.21%	-51.37%	+31.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.96%	14.58%	-11.62%

Volatility

MLPA vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) is 4.66%, while Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a volatility of 19.47%. This indicates that MLPA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLPA	SIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.66%	19.47%	-14.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.76%	44.45%	-35.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.14%	52.59%	-40.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.08%	39.84%	-21.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.44%	39.90%	-12.46%

MLPA vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPA has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than SIL's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPA vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison

MLPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.39%, more than SIL's 1.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MLPA Global X MLP ETF	7.39%	7.82%	7.25%	7.49%	7.30%	8.72%	13.84%	9.09%	10.00%	8.05%	7.15%	9.29%
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	1.26%	1.18%	2.40%	0.59%	0.48%	1.59%	1.92%	1.53%	1.21%	0.02%	3.34%	0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPA and SIL in my portfolio?

MLPA and SIL have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MLPA or SIL?

SIL has higher volatility (19.47%) compared to MLPA (4.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPA dropped -78.75% vs SIL's -82.99%.

Which ETF is better, MLPA or SIL?

On 10-year performance, SIL leads with 8.64% vs 6.04% for MLPA. On fees, SIL is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, MLPA has been the lower-risk option at 4.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MLPA or SIL?

Over the 10-year period, SIL has performed better with a 8.64% return vs 6.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MLPA or SIL?

SIL is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for MLPA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MLPA or SIL?

MLPA has the higher dividend yield at 7.39%, compared with 1.26% for SIL.

What is the main difference between MLPA and SIL?

MLPA is categorized as MLPs, while SIL is Silver. MLPA tracks Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index, while SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for MLPA and 0.65% for SIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MLPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.