MLPA vs. SCMB
MLPA (Global X MLP ETF) and SCMB (Schwab Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPA is a MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index, while SCMB is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MLPA returned 17.12%/yr vs 3.37%/yr for SCMB. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MLPA charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCMB.
Performance
MLPA vs. SCMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPA achieves a 16.07% return, which is significantly higher than SCMB's 1.07% return.
MLPA
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- 16.07%
- 6M
- 14.82%
- 1Y
- 16.32%
- 3Y*
- 17.12%
- 5Y*
- 15.58%
- 10Y*
- 6.22%
SCMB
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 1.07%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- 6.86%
- 3Y*
- 3.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MLPA vs. SCMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPA Global X MLP ETF | 16.07% | 5.73% | 20.35% | 15.93% | 3.07% |
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF | 1.07% | 3.78% | 0.91% | 5.86% | 3.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPA and SCMB is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2022 | 0.02 |
The correlation between MLPA and SCMB shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.04 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MLPA vs. SCMB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MLPA
SCMB
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Energy
MLPA
SCMB
Utilities
MLPA
SCMB
Basic Materials
MLPA
-
SCMB
Communication Services
MLPA
-
SCMB
Consumer Cyclical
MLPA
-
SCMB
Consumer Defensive
MLPA
-
SCMB
Financial Services
MLPA
-
SCMB
Healthcare
MLPA
-
SCMB
Industrials
MLPA
-
SCMB
Real Estate
MLPA
-
SCMB
Technology
MLPA
-
SCMB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPA vs. SCMB — Risk / Return Rank
MLPA
SCMB
MLPA vs. SCMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLPA | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.50 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 2.36 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.99 | 7.89 | -1.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPA | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 2.34 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.97 | -0.81 |
Drawdowns
MLPA vs. SCMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPA drawdown since its inception was -78.75%, which is greater than SCMB's maximum drawdown of -6.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPA and SCMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPA | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.75% | -6.13% | -72.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.33% | -2.92% | -5.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.20% | -5.57% | -8.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.84% | -0.87% | -2.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.27% | -1.32% | -18.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 0.87% | +1.86% |
Volatility
MLPA vs. SCMB - Volatility Comparison
Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) at 1.04%. This indicates that MLPA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPA | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.50% | 1.04% | +3.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.47% | 2.17% | +6.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.00% | 2.94% | +9.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 4.16% | +14.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.47% | 4.16% | +23.31% |
MLPA vs. SCMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPA has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than SCMB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPA vs. SCMB - Dividend Comparison
MLPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.28%, more than SCMB's 3.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPA Global X MLP ETF | 7.28% | 7.82% | 7.25% | 7.49% | 7.30% | 8.72% | 13.84% | 9.09% | 10.00% | 8.05% | 7.15% | 9.29% |
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF | 3.54% | 3.36% | 3.34% | 3.10% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MLPA and SCMB have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLPA has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to SCMB (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPA dropped -78.75% vs SCMB's -6.13%.
On 3-year performance, MLPA leads with 17.12% vs 3.37% for SCMB. On fees, SCMB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MLPA has performed better with a 17.12% return vs 3.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCMB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for MLPA.
MLPA has the higher dividend yield at 7.28%, compared with 3.54% for SCMB.
MLPA is categorized as MLPs, while SCMB is Municipal Bonds. MLPA tracks Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index, while SCMB tracks ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for MLPA and 0.03% for SCMB.
SCMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLPA and SCMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer