MLPA vs. GMNY

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

MLPA (Global X MLP ETF) and GMNY (Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York Municipal Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPA is a MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index, while GMNY is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. MLPA is passively managed, while GMNY is actively managed. Over the past year, MLPA returned 16.37% vs 6.17% for GMNY. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. MLPA charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for GMNY.

Performance

MLPA vs. GMNY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York Municipal Income ETF (GMNY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPA achieves a 16.12% return, which is significantly higher than GMNY's 2.11% return.

MLPA

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: 1.22%
• 6M: 14.09%
• YTD: 16.12%
• 1Y: 16.37%
• 3Y*: 16.19%
• 5Y*: 15.54%
• 10Y*: 5.85%

GMNY

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.37%
• 6M: 1.55%
• YTD: 2.11%
• 1Y: 6.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPA vs. GMNY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MLPA Global X MLP ETF	16.12%	5.73%	5.36%
GMNY Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York Municipal Income ETF	2.11%	3.79%	0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPA and GMNY is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2024	-0.09

The correlation between MLPA and GMNY shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to -0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MLPA vs. GMNY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPA

MLPA Risk / Return Rank: 46
MLPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
MLPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
MLPA Omega Ratio Rank: 43
MLPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
MLPA Martin Ratio Rank: 40

GMNY

GMNY Risk / Return Rank: 80
GMNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
GMNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
GMNY Omega Ratio Rank: 90
GMNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
GMNY Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPA vs. GMNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York Municipal Income ETF (GMNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MLPA	GMNY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	2.20	-0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	3.18	-1.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.46	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.99	2.69	-0.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.23	10.44	-5.22

MLPA vs. GMNY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPA Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the GMNY Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPA and GMNY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MLPA vs. GMNY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPA drawdown since its inception was -78.75%, which is greater than GMNY's maximum drawdown of -4.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPA and GMNY.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPA	GMNY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.75%	-4.00%	-74.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.33%	-2.21%	-6.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.20%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.75%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-74.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.81%	-0.31%	-3.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.16%	-0.88%	-19.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.17%	0.58%	+2.59%

Volatility

MLPA vs. GMNY - Volatility Comparison

Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) has a higher volatility of 5.10% compared to Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York Municipal Income ETF (GMNY) at 0.57%. This indicates that MLPA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLPA	GMNY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.10%	0.57%	+4.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.42%	2.05%	+7.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.38%	2.70%	+9.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.02%	3.54%	+14.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.41%	3.54%	+23.87%

MLPA vs. GMNY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPA has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than GMNY's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPA vs. GMNY - Dividend Comparison

MLPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, more than GMNY's 3.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GMNY Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York Municipal Income ETF	3.29%	3.33%	1.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MLPA Global X MLP ETF	7.27%	7.82%	7.25%	7.49%	7.30%	8.72%	13.84%	9.09%	10.00%	8.05%	7.15%	9.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPA and GMNY in my portfolio?

MLPA and GMNY have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MLPA or GMNY?

MLPA has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to GMNY (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPA dropped -78.75% vs GMNY's -4.00%.

Which ETF is better, MLPA or GMNY?

On 1-year performance, MLPA leads with 16.37% vs 6.17% for GMNY. On fees, GMNY is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, GMNY has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MLPA or GMNY?

Over the 1-year period, MLPA has performed better with a 16.37% return vs 6.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MLPA or GMNY?

GMNY is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for MLPA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MLPA or GMNY?

MLPA has the higher dividend yield at 7.27%, compared with 3.29% for GMNY.

What is the main difference between MLPA and GMNY?

MLPA is categorized as MLPs, while GMNY is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for MLPA and 0.30% for GMNY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GMNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.