GMNY vs. SCMB

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

GMNY (Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York Municipal Income ETF) and SCMB (Schwab Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. GMNY is actively managed, while SCMB is passively managed. Over the past year, GMNY returned 4.75% vs 4.38% for SCMB. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GMNY charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCMB.

Performance

GMNY vs. SCMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York Municipal Income ETF (GMNY) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMNY achieves a 1.02% return, which is significantly higher than SCMB's 0.06% return.

GMNY

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -1.34%
• 6M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.02%
• 1Y: 4.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.79%

SCMB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.78%
• 6M: -0.52%
• YTD: 0.06%
• 1Y: 4.38%
• 3Y*: 2.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GMNY Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York Municipal Income ETF	$150.89K	$140.38K	$172.55K
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF	$37.46M	$30.33M	$30.04M

GMNY vs. SCMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GMNY Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York Municipal Income ETF	1.02%	3.79%	0.82%
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF	0.06%	3.78%	0.97%

Correlation

The correlation between GMNY and SCMB is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2024	0.73

The correlation between GMNY and SCMB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GMNY vs. SCMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GMNY

GMNY Risk / Return Rank: 79
GMNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
GMNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
GMNY Omega Ratio Rank: 88
GMNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
GMNY Martin Ratio Rank: 71

SCMB

SCMB Risk / Return Rank: 67
SCMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
SCMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
SCMB Omega Ratio Rank: 83
SCMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
SCMB Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GMNY vs. SCMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York Municipal Income ETF (GMNY) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GMNY	SCMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	1.73	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	2.46	+0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.35	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	1.79	+0.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.80	5.53	+3.27

GMNY vs. SCMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMNY Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the SCMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMNY and SCMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GMNY vs. SCMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMNY drawdown since its inception was -4.00%, smaller than the maximum SCMB drawdown of -6.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMNY and SCMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMNY	SCMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.00%	-6.13%	+2.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.21%	-2.92%	+0.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-4.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.37%	-1.86%	+0.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.88%	-1.30%	+0.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.61%	0.94%	-0.33%

Volatility

GMNY vs. SCMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York Municipal Income ETF (GMNY) is 0.71%, while Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) has a volatility of 1.02%. This indicates that GMNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GMNY	SCMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.71%	1.02%	-0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.11%	2.35%	-0.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.73%	3.01%	-0.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.52%	4.12%	-0.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.52%	4.12%	-0.60%

GMNY vs. SCMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMNY has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SCMB's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

GMNY vs. SCMB - Dividend Comparison

GMNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, less than SCMB's 3.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GMNY Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York Municipal Income ETF	3.17%	3.33%	1.47%	0.00%	0.00%
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF	3.26%	3.36%	3.34%	3.10%	0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMNY and SCMB in my portfolio?

GMNY and SCMB have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GMNY or SCMB?

SCMB has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to GMNY (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMNY dropped -4.00% vs SCMB's -6.13%.

Which ETF is better, GMNY or SCMB?

On 1-year performance, GMNY leads with 4.75% vs 4.38% for SCMB. On fees, SCMB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, GMNY has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GMNY or SCMB?

Over the 1-year period, GMNY has performed better with a 4.75% return vs 4.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GMNY or SCMB?

SCMB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for GMNY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GMNY or SCMB?

SCMB has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 3.17% for GMNY.

What is the main difference between GMNY and SCMB?

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GMNY and 0.03% for SCMB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GMNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.