MLPA vs. AMPL
MLPA (Global X MLP ETF) is MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index, while AMPL (Amplitude, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, MLPA returned 17.12%/yr vs -6.27%/yr for AMPL. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MLPA vs. AMPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPA achieves a 16.07% return, which is significantly higher than AMPL's -29.97% return.
MLPA
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- 16.07%
- 6M
- 14.82%
- 1Y
- 16.32%
- 3Y*
- 17.12%
- 5Y*
- 15.58%
- 10Y*
- 6.22%
AMPL
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- -29.97%
- 6M
- -23.78%
- 1Y
- -36.69%
- 3Y*
- -6.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MLPA vs. AMPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPA Global X MLP ETF | 16.07% | 5.73% | 20.35% | 15.93% | 27.03% | 1.01% |
AMPL Amplitude, Inc. | -29.97% | 9.76% | -17.06% | 5.30% | -77.18% | -3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPA and AMPL is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2021 | 0.21 |
The correlation between MLPA and AMPL shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPA vs. AMPL — Risk / Return Rank
MLPA
AMPL
MLPA vs. AMPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) and Amplitude, Inc. (AMPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLPA | AMPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.92 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | -0.64 | +2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.99 | -1.19 | +7.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPA | AMPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | -0.61 | +1.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | -0.52 | +0.68 |
Drawdowns
MLPA vs. AMPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPA drawdown since its inception was -78.75%, smaller than the maximum AMPL drawdown of -93.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPA and AMPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPA | AMPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.75% | -93.38% | +14.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.33% | -57.79% | +49.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.20% | -61.15% | +46.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.84% | -90.44% | +86.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.27% | -81.26% | +60.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 30.89% | -28.16% |
Volatility
MLPA vs. AMPL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) is 4.50%, while Amplitude, Inc. (AMPL) has a volatility of 33.53%. This indicates that MLPA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPA | AMPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.50% | 33.53% | -29.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.47% | 51.85% | -43.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.00% | 60.55% | -48.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 65.27% | -47.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.47% | 65.27% | -37.80% |
Dividends
MLPA vs. AMPL - Dividend Comparison
MLPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.28%, while AMPL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMPL Amplitude, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLPA Global X MLP ETF | 7.28% | 7.82% | 7.25% | 7.49% | 7.30% | 8.72% | 13.84% | 9.09% | 10.00% | 8.05% | 7.15% | 9.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MLPA and AMPL have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMPL has higher volatility (33.53%) compared to MLPA (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPA dropped -78.75% vs AMPL's -93.38%.
MLPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLPA and AMPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer