PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPA vs. AMPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPA vs. AMPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) and Amplitude, Inc. (AMPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPA achieves a 16.07% return, which is significantly higher than AMPL's -29.97% return.


MLPA

1D
-0.31%
1M
-0.52%
YTD
16.07%
6M
14.82%
1Y
16.32%
3Y*
17.12%
5Y*
15.58%
10Y*
6.22%

AMPL

1D
-2.76%
1M
0.87%
YTD
-29.97%
6M
-23.78%
1Y
-36.69%
3Y*
-6.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPA vs. AMPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MLPA
Global X MLP ETF
16.07%5.73%20.35%15.93%27.03%1.01%
AMPL
Amplitude, Inc.
-29.97%9.76%-17.06%5.30%-77.18%-3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPA and AMPL is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2021

0.21

The correlation between MLPA and AMPL shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPA vs. AMPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPA
MLPA Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MLPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPA Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPA Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

AMPL
AMPL Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
AMPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMPL Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
AMPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMPL Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPA vs. AMPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) and Amplitude, Inc. (AMPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPAAMPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.92

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

-0.64

+2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.99

-1.19

+7.18

MLPA vs. AMPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPA Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the AMPL Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPA and AMPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPAAMPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

-0.61

+1.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

-0.52

+0.68

Drawdowns

MLPA vs. AMPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPA drawdown since its inception was -78.75%, smaller than the maximum AMPL drawdown of -93.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPA and AMPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPAAMPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.75%

-93.38%

+14.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.33%

-57.79%

+49.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.20%

-61.15%

+46.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.84%

-90.44%

+86.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.27%

-81.26%

+60.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

30.89%

-28.16%

Volatility

MLPA vs. AMPL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) is 4.50%, while Amplitude, Inc. (AMPL) has a volatility of 33.53%. This indicates that MLPA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPAAMPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

33.53%

-29.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.47%

51.85%

-43.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.00%

60.55%

-48.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.21%

65.27%

-47.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.47%

65.27%

-37.80%

Dividends

MLPA vs. AMPL - Dividend Comparison

MLPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.28%, while AMPL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMPL
Amplitude, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MLPA
Global X MLP ETF
7.28%7.82%7.25%7.49%7.30%8.72%13.84%9.09%10.00%8.05%7.15%9.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPA and AMPL have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMPL has higher volatility (33.53%) compared to MLPA (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPA dropped -78.75% vs AMPL's -93.38%.

MLPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPA and AMPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer