MLNIX vs. GQFPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MLNIX (Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Concentrated Portfolio) and GQFPX (GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, MLNIX returned 21.87%/yr vs 14.73%/yr for GQFPX. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MLNIX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for GQFPX.

Performance

MLNIX vs. GQFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Concentrated Portfolio (MLNIX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLNIX achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly lower than GQFPX's 8.80% return.

MLNIX

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 3.72%
• YTD: 4.18%
• 6M: 5.33%
• 1Y: 13.45%
• 3Y*: 21.87%
• 5Y*: 9.75%
• 10Y*: —

GQFPX

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: -2.50%
• YTD: 8.80%
• 6M: 9.02%
• 1Y: 15.73%
• 3Y*: 14.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLNIX vs. GQFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MLNIX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Concentrated Portfolio	4.18%	17.59%	32.90%	18.42%	-22.28%	6.04%
GQFPX GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund	8.80%	19.29%	4.81%	15.09%	-1.13%	5.03%

Correlation

The correlation between MLNIX and GQFPX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021	0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between MLNIX and GQFPX has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MLNIX vs. GQFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLNIX

MLNIX Risk / Return Rank: 11
MLNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
MLNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
MLNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
MLNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
MLNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

GQFPX

GQFPX Risk / Return Rank: 39
GQFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
GQFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
GQFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
GQFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
GQFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLNIX vs. GQFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Concentrated Portfolio (MLNIX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MLNIX	GQFPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.88	1.66	-0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.36	2.35	-0.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.29	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.86	2.99	-2.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.07	8.58	-5.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MLNIX vs. GQFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLNIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the GQFPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLNIX and GQFPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MLNIX	GQFPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88	1.66	-0.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.82	-0.21

Drawdowns

MLNIX vs. GQFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLNIX drawdown since its inception was -34.79%, which is greater than GQFPX's maximum drawdown of -16.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLNIX and GQFPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLNIX	GQFPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.79%	-16.95%	-17.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.10%	-5.24%	-10.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.47%	-10.57%	-8.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.63%	-3.93%	+3.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.02%	-3.00%	-5.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.48%	1.82%	+2.66%

Volatility

MLNIX vs. GQFPX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Concentrated Portfolio (MLNIX) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) at 3.24%. This indicates that MLNIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLNIX	GQFPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.37%	3.24%	+1.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.28%	7.63%	+5.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.68%	9.47%	+6.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.47%	12.82%	+6.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.23%	12.82%	+7.41%

MLNIX vs. GQFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLNIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GQFPX's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLNIX vs. GQFPX - Dividend Comparison

MLNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than GQFPX's 5.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GQFPX GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund	5.87%	5.32%	3.71%	3.69%	5.18%	1.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MLNIX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Concentrated Portfolio	1.80%	1.88%	0.20%	0.79%	0.30%	3.80%	0.00%	1.11%	0.72%	0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLNIX and GQFPX in my portfolio?

MLNIX and GQFPX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MLNIX or GQFPX?

MLNIX has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to GQFPX (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLNIX dropped -34.79% vs GQFPX's -16.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GQFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.