PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLNIX vs. MVGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLNIX vs. MVGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Concentrated Portfolio (MLNIX) and MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund (MVGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLNIX achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly higher than MVGIX's 2.95% return.


MLNIX

1D
-0.63%
1M
3.72%
YTD
4.18%
6M
5.33%
1Y
13.45%
3Y*
21.87%
5Y*
9.75%
10Y*

MVGIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.28%
YTD
2.95%
6M
3.95%
1Y
10.44%
3Y*
13.00%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*
9.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLNIX vs. MVGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLNIX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Concentrated Portfolio
4.18%17.59%32.90%18.42%-22.28%17.75%23.52%33.11%-14.62%21.09%
MVGIX
MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund
2.95%16.30%12.64%13.71%-8.21%16.84%5.47%20.59%-2.40%17.98%

Correlation

The correlation between MLNIX and MVGIX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.77

The correlation between MLNIX and MVGIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLNIX vs. MVGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLNIX
MLNIX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
MLNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MLNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

MVGIX
MVGIX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
MVGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MVGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLNIX vs. MVGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Concentrated Portfolio (MLNIX) and MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund (MVGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLNIXMVGIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.88

1.26

-0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.36

1.82

-0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.23

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

1.18

-0.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.07

3.94

-0.87

MLNIX vs. MVGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLNIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the MVGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLNIX and MVGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLNIXMVGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

1.26

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.83

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.74

-0.13

Drawdowns

MLNIX vs. MVGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLNIX drawdown since its inception was -34.79%, which is greater than MVGIX's maximum drawdown of -30.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLNIX and MVGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLNIXMVGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.79%

-30.19%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.10%

-8.65%

-7.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.47%

-8.70%

-10.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.85%

-18.01%

-13.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-4.35%

+3.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-2.91%

-5.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.48%

2.59%

+1.89%

Volatility

MLNIX vs. MVGIX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Concentrated Portfolio (MLNIX) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund (MVGIX) at 2.02%. This indicates that MLNIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLNIXMVGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

2.02%

+2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.28%

6.26%

+7.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.68%

8.14%

+7.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.47%

10.54%

+8.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.23%

12.39%

+7.84%

MLNIX vs. MVGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLNIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than MVGIX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLNIX vs. MVGIX - Dividend Comparison

MLNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than MVGIX's 10.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLNIX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Concentrated Portfolio
1.80%1.88%0.20%0.79%0.30%3.80%0.00%1.11%0.72%0.30%0.00%0.00%
MVGIX
MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund
10.63%10.94%7.84%1.88%3.98%9.43%1.55%2.79%4.98%1.95%1.60%1.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLNIX and MVGIX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLNIX has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to MVGIX (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLNIX dropped -34.79% vs MVGIX's -30.19%.

MVGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLNIX and MVGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer