MLN vs. RTAI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MLN (VanEck Long Muni ETF) and RTAI (Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. MLN is passively managed, while RTAI is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, MLN returned -0.94%/yr vs -0.71%/yr for RTAI. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MLN charges 0.24%/yr vs 3.78%/yr for RTAI.

Performance

MLN vs. RTAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Long Muni ETF (MLN) and Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF (RTAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLN achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly lower than RTAI's 3.90% return.

MLN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.41%
• YTD: 2.53%
• 6M: 2.00%
• 1Y: 8.68%
• 3Y*: 3.45%
• 5Y*: -0.94%
• 10Y*: 1.37%

RTAI

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 3.23%
• YTD: 3.90%
• 6M: 4.64%
• 1Y: 11.68%
• 3Y*: 7.08%
• 5Y*: -0.71%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLN vs. RTAI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MLN VanEck Long Muni ETF	2.53%	1.82%	1.54%	8.05%	-17.20%	2.20%	3.13%
RTAI Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF	3.90%	5.54%	7.17%	4.33%	-22.55%	10.62%	5.08%

Correlation

The correlation between MLN and RTAI is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2020	0.54

The correlation between MLN and RTAI shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.60 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MLN vs. RTAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLN

MLN Risk / Return Rank: 70
MLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
MLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
MLN Omega Ratio Rank: 76
MLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
MLN Martin Ratio Rank: 66

RTAI

RTAI Risk / Return Rank: 56
RTAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
RTAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
RTAI Omega Ratio Rank: 64
RTAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
RTAI Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLN vs. RTAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Long Muni ETF (MLN) and Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF (RTAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MLN	RTAI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	1.75	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.94	2.82	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.35	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.41	1.90	+1.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.19	7.69	+3.51

MLN vs. RTAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the RTAI Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLN and RTAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MLN vs. RTAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLN drawdown since its inception was -28.36%, smaller than the maximum RTAI drawdown of -34.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLN and RTAI.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLN	RTAI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.36%	-34.32%	+5.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.56%	-6.18%	+3.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.84%	-15.71%	+5.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.46%	-34.32%	+9.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.02%	-6.33%	+0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.73%	-13.76%	+8.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.78%	1.52%	-0.74%

Volatility

MLN vs. RTAI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Long Muni ETF (MLN) is 1.29%, while Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF (RTAI) has a volatility of 2.02%. This indicates that MLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RTAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLN	RTAI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.29%	2.02%	-0.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.24%	5.47%	-2.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.42%	6.72%	-2.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.32%	9.36%	-2.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.88%	9.03%	-0.15%

MLN vs. RTAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLN has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than RTAI's 3.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLN vs. RTAI - Dividend Comparison

MLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, less than RTAI's 4.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MLN VanEck Long Muni ETF	3.69%	3.73%	3.59%	3.19%	2.67%	2.52%	2.69%	2.98%	3.09%	2.91%	3.16%	3.38%
RTAI Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF	4.98%	5.66%	5.02%	3.07%	3.71%	4.73%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLN and RTAI in my portfolio?

MLN and RTAI have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MLN or RTAI?

RTAI has higher volatility (2.02%) compared to MLN (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLN dropped -28.36% vs RTAI's -34.32%.

Which ETF is better, MLN or RTAI?

On 5-year performance, RTAI leads with -0.71% vs -0.94% for MLN. On fees, MLN is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, MLN has been the lower-risk option at 1.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MLN or RTAI?

Over the 5-year period, RTAI has performed better with a -0.71% return vs -0.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MLN or RTAI?

MLN is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 3.78% for RTAI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MLN or RTAI?

RTAI has the higher dividend yield at 4.98%, compared with 3.69% for MLN.

What is the main difference between MLN and RTAI?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Rareview Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for MLN and 3.78% for RTAI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.