MLN vs. LKOR
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Long Muni ETF (MLN) and FlexShares Credit-Scored U.S. Long Corporate Bond Index Fund (LKOR).
MLN and LKOR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MLN is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg AMT-Free Long Continuous. It was launched on Jan 2, 2008. LKOR is a passively managed fund by Northern Trust that tracks the performance of the Northern Trust US Long Corporate Bond Quality Value Index. It was launched on Sep 24, 2015. Both MLN and LKOR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MLN or LKOR.
Key characteristics
| MLN | LKOR | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -0.64% | -3.77% |
| 1Y Return | 3.03% | 3.01% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -3.34% | -5.49% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 0.05% | 0.93% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.38 | 0.17 |
| Daily Std Dev | 7.67% | 12.93% |
| Max Drawdown | -28.36% | -34.78% |
| Current Drawdown | -11.91% | -22.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLN and LKOR is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
MLN vs. LKOR - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, MLN achieves a -0.64% return, which is significantly higher than LKOR's -3.77% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLN vs. LKOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLN has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than LKOR's 0.22% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MLN vs. LKOR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Long Muni ETF (MLN) and FlexShares Credit-Scored U.S. Long Corporate Bond Index Fund (LKOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MLN vs. LKOR - Dividend Comparison
MLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than LKOR's 5.38% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLN VanEck Long Muni ETF | 3.42% | 3.19% | 2.67% | 2.52% | 2.69% | 2.87% | 3.09% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 3.38% | 3.78% | 4.42% |
LKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored U.S. Long Corporate Bond Index Fund | 5.38% | 4.90% | 4.71% | 4.73% | 6.56% | 3.71% | 4.21% | 3.78% | 5.53% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MLN vs. LKOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLN drawdown since its inception was -28.36%, smaller than the maximum LKOR drawdown of -34.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLN and LKOR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MLN vs. LKOR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Long Muni ETF (MLN) is 1.21%, while FlexShares Credit-Scored U.S. Long Corporate Bond Index Fund (LKOR) has a volatility of 3.06%. This indicates that MLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LKOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.