MLN vs. AMUN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MLN (VanEck Long Muni ETF) and AMUN (abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. MLN is passively managed, while AMUN is actively managed. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MLN charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMUN.

Performance

MLN vs. AMUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Long Muni ETF (MLN) and abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF (AMUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLN achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly higher than AMUN's 1.11% return.

MLN

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 1.92%
• 6M: 2.58%
• 1Y: 9.33%
• 3Y*: 3.46%
• 5Y*: -1.05%
• 10Y*: 1.49%

AMUN

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 1.11%
• 6M: 1.36%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLN vs. AMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MLN VanEck Long Muni ETF	1.92%	-0.18%
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF	1.11%	0.14%

Correlation

The correlation between MLN and AMUN is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025	0.15

Return for Risk

MLN vs. AMUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLN

MLN Risk / Return Rank: 69
MLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
MLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
MLN Omega Ratio Rank: 75
MLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
MLN Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLN vs. AMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Long Muni ETF (MLN) and abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF (AMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MLN	AMUN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.66	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.02	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MLN	AMUN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.17	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	2.05	-1.73

Drawdowns

MLN vs. AMUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLN drawdown since its inception was -28.36%, which is greater than AMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLN and AMUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLN	AMUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.36%	-0.61%	-27.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.84%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.58%	-0.02%	-6.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.73%	-0.09%	-5.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.78%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MLN	AMUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.56%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.19%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.45%	1.01%	+3.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.31%	1.01%	+6.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.88%	1.01%	+7.87%

MLN vs. AMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLN has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than AMUN's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MLN vs. AMUN - Dividend Comparison

MLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, more than AMUN's 1.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF	1.89%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MLN VanEck Long Muni ETF	3.71%	3.73%	3.59%	3.19%	2.67%	2.52%	2.69%	2.98%	3.09%	2.91%	3.16%	3.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLN and AMUN in my portfolio?

MLN and AMUN have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MLN or AMUN?

On fees, MLN is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MLN or AMUN?

MLN is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AMUN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MLN or AMUN?

MLN has the higher dividend yield at 3.71%, compared with 1.89% for AMUN.

What is the main difference between MLN and AMUN?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for MLN and 0.25% for AMUN.