PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLLIX vs. MIGFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLLIX vs. MIGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Lifetime Income Fund (MLLIX) and MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLLIX achieves a 3.64% return, which is significantly higher than MIGFX's -0.34% return. Over the past 10 years, MLLIX has underperformed MIGFX with an annualized return of 5.09%, while MIGFX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.65% annualized return.


MLLIX

1D
0.16%
1M
1.26%
YTD
3.64%
6M
3.84%
1Y
9.89%
3Y*
8.00%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
5.09%

MIGFX

1D
-0.62%
1M
3.14%
YTD
-0.34%
6M
0.15%
1Y
9.70%
3Y*
15.64%
5Y*
10.07%
10Y*
14.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLLIX vs. MIGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLLIX
MFS Lifetime Income Fund
3.64%9.32%5.62%9.12%-11.99%6.63%10.06%13.91%-2.37%8.24%
MIGFX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund
-0.34%9.97%27.25%24.13%-19.20%26.06%22.55%39.89%0.81%28.68%

Correlation

The correlation between MLLIX and MIGFX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2005

0.78

The correlation between MLLIX and MIGFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLLIX vs. MIGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLLIX
MLLIX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
MLLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
MLLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

MIGFX
MIGFX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
MIGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
MIGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLLIX vs. MIGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Lifetime Income Fund (MLLIX) and MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLLIXMIGFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.15

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

0.76

+1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.68

2.55

+9.13

MLLIX vs. MIGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLLIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the MIGFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLLIX and MIGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLLIXMIGFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

0.83

+1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.58

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.81

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.39

+0.46

Drawdowns

MLLIX vs. MIGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLLIX drawdown since its inception was -17.32%, smaller than the maximum MIGFX drawdown of -61.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLLIX and MIGFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLLIXMIGFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.32%

-61.83%

+44.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.86%

-13.77%

+9.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.74%

-18.68%

+12.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.08%

-26.67%

+10.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.08%

-32.42%

+16.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.40%

+2.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.15%

-18.96%

+16.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

4.11%

-3.25%

Volatility

MLLIX vs. MIGFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Lifetime Income Fund (MLLIX) is 1.41%, while MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX) has a volatility of 3.42%. This indicates that MLLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLLIXMIGFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

3.42%

-2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.46%

9.84%

-6.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.33%

12.68%

-8.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.91%

17.52%

-11.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.71%

18.21%

-12.50%

MLLIX vs. MIGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLLIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MIGFX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLLIX vs. MIGFX - Dividend Comparison

MLLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.68%, less than MIGFX's 11.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MIGFX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund
11.43%11.39%17.15%4.11%4.49%10.47%7.43%7.39%10.76%6.87%5.12%6.51%
MLLIX
MFS Lifetime Income Fund
7.68%6.01%6.26%3.70%3.92%6.12%3.18%3.80%4.20%3.56%4.21%2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLLIX and MIGFX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MIGFX has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to MLLIX (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLLIX dropped -17.32% vs MIGFX's -61.83%.

MLLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLLIX and MIGFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer