PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLI vs. ENSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MLI vs. ENSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) and The Ensign Group, Inc. (ENSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLI achieves a 20.99% return, which is significantly higher than ENSG's -14.23% return. Over the past 10 years, MLI has outperformed ENSG with an annualized return of 26.81%, while ENSG has yielded a comparatively lower 23.42% annualized return.


MLI

1D
1.92%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
20.99%
6M
21.99%
1Y
87.91%
3Y*
51.41%
5Y*
44.58%
10Y*
26.81%

ENSG

1D
1.52%
1M
-16.67%
YTD
-14.23%
6M
-14.89%
1Y
-1.09%
3Y*
17.27%
5Y*
12.36%
10Y*
23.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLI vs. ENSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLI
Mueller Industries, Inc.
20.99%46.29%70.51%62.38%1.05%70.95%12.30%37.79%-33.10%-2.76%
ENSG
The Ensign Group, Inc.
-14.23%31.33%18.62%18.89%12.98%15.43%61.43%25.53%75.67%0.78%

Correlation

The correlation between MLI and ENSG is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2007

0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between MLI and ENSG has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

MLI:

$10.18

ENSG:

$6.15

PE Ratio

MLI:

13.57

ENSG:

24.30

PEG Ratio

MLI:

0.88

ENSG:

1.61

PS Ratio

MLI:

2.63

ENSG:

1.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

MLI:

$4.37B

ENSG:

$5.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MLI:

$871.92M

ENSG:

$800.38M

EBITDA (TTM)

MLI:

$1.03B

ENSG:

$590.49M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLI vs. ENSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLI
MLI Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLI Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
MLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLI Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

ENSG
ENSG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
ENSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENSG Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ENSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENSG Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLI vs. ENSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) and The Ensign Group, Inc. (ENSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MLIENSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.02

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.72

-0.03

+3.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.31

-0.12

+10.43

MLI vs. ENSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLI Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the ENSG Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLI and ENSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MLI vs. ENSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLI drawdown since its inception was -61.72%, which is greater than ENSG's maximum drawdown of -55.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLI and ENSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLIENSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.72%

-55.57%

-6.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.33%

-31.81%

+9.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.79%

-31.81%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.79%

-31.81%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.95%

-55.57%

+2.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

-30.77%

+29.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.04%

-12.26%

-3.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.05%

9.18%

-1.13%

Volatility

MLI vs. ENSG - Volatility Comparison

Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) and The Ensign Group, Inc. (ENSG) have volatilities of 10.51% and 11.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLIENSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.51%

11.00%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.80%

22.53%

+3.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.28%

28.17%

+2.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.06%

26.73%

+6.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.77%

36.09%

-0.32%

Dividends

MLI vs. ENSG - Dividend Comparison

MLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, more than ENSG's 0.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENSG
The Ensign Group, Inc.
0.17%0.14%0.18%0.21%0.24%0.25%0.28%0.40%0.47%0.78%0.73%0.67%
MLI
Mueller Industries, Inc.
0.87%0.87%1.01%1.27%1.69%0.88%1.14%1.26%1.71%9.60%0.94%1.11%

Financials

MLI vs. ENSG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mueller Industries, Inc. and The Ensign Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
1.19B
1.39B
(MLI) Total Revenue
(ENSG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MLI vs. ENSG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mueller Industries, Inc. and The Ensign Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%202220232024202520260
21.1%
Portfolio components
MLI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ENSG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Ensign Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 293.37M and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.1%.

MLI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 312.23M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.2%.

ENSG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Ensign Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 124.85M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.0%.

MLI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 239.02M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in a net margin of 20.0%.

ENSG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Ensign Group, Inc. reported a net income of 99.67M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MLI and ENSG have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ENSG has higher volatility (11.00%) compared to MLI (10.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLI dropped -61.72% vs ENSG's -55.57%.

MLI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLI and ENSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer