MLEC vs. CIFR

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MLEC (Moolec Science SA Ordinary Shares) and CIFR (Cipher Mining Inc.) are both stocks. MLEC operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while CIFR operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, MLEC returned -75.30%/yr vs 116.66%/yr for CIFR. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

MLEC vs. CIFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Moolec Science SA Ordinary Shares (MLEC) and Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MLEC having a 78.84% return and CIFR slightly lower at 77.78%.

MLEC

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -34.14%
• YTD: 78.84%
• 6M: -5.73%
• 1Y: -94.31%
• 3Y*: -75.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIFR

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 46.67%
• YTD: 77.78%
• 6M: 40.85%
• 1Y: 663.90%
• 3Y*: 116.66%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLEC vs. CIFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MLEC Moolec Science SA Ordinary Shares	78.84%	-96.82%	-67.48%	-72.97%
CIFR Cipher Mining Inc.	77.78%	218.10%	12.35%	545.62%

Correlation

The correlation between MLEC and CIFR is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2023	-0.01

The correlation between MLEC and CIFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.02 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) MLEC : $7.83M CIFR : $174.98M
Gross Profit (TTM) MLEC : -$639.50K CIFR : -$172.84M
EBITDA (TTM) MLEC : -$5.21M CIFR : -$169.22M

Return for Risk

MLEC vs. CIFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLEC

MLEC Risk / Return Rank: 12
MLEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
MLEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
MLEC Omega Ratio Rank: 11
MLEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
MLEC Martin Ratio Rank: 16

CIFR

CIFR Risk / Return Rank: 96
CIFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CIFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CIFR Omega Ratio Rank: 92
CIFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CIFR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLEC vs. CIFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Moolec Science SA Ordinary Shares (MLEC) and Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MLEC	CIFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.46	6.19	-6.65
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.15	4.23	-5.38
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	1.49	-0.62
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.97	13.04	-14.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.12	26.19	-27.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MLEC vs. CIFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLEC Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is lower than the CIFR Sharpe Ratio of 6.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLEC and CIFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MLEC	CIFR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.46	6.19	-6.65
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.40	0.18	-0.58

Drawdowns

MLEC vs. CIFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLEC drawdown since its inception was -99.88%, roughly equal to the maximum CIFR drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLEC and CIFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLEC	CIFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.88%	-97.16%	-2.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-97.34%	-51.38%	-45.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-99.41%	-71.74%	-27.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.76%	-0.19%	-99.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-91.71%	-66.62%	-25.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	84.38%	25.53%	+58.85%

Volatility

MLEC vs. CIFR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Moolec Science SA Ordinary Shares (MLEC) is 26.27%, while Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) has a volatility of 31.03%. This indicates that MLEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLEC	CIFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.27%	31.03%	-4.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	163.17%	70.59%	+92.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	206.61%	108.31%	+98.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	198.11%	121.98%	+76.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	198.11%	121.98%	+76.13%

Dividends

MLEC vs. CIFR - Dividend Comparison

Neither MLEC nor CIFR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLEC and CIFR in my portfolio?

MLEC and CIFR have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MLEC or CIFR?

CIFR has higher volatility (31.03%) compared to MLEC (26.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLEC dropped -99.88% vs CIFR's -97.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CIFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.19 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.