ML vs. FLYW

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

ML (MoneyLion Inc.) and FLYW (Flywire Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — ML in Software - Application, FLYW in Information Technology Services. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ML vs. FLYW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MoneyLion Inc. (ML) and Flywire Corporation (FLYW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ML

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLYW

• 1D: -3.61%
• 1M: -19.44%
• YTD: -1.98%
• 6M: 2.89%
• 1Y: 32.19%
• 3Y*: -24.08%
• 5Y*: -13.76%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ML vs. FLYW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ML MoneyLion Inc.	0.00%	-0.13%	37.20%	237.04%	-84.62%	-59.29%
FLYW Flywire Corporation	-1.98%	-31.33%	-10.93%	-5.39%	-35.71%	8.43%

Correlation

The correlation between ML and FLYW is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021	0.29

The correlation between ML and FLYW shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (3 years) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) ML : $545.91M FLYW : $188.60B
Gross Profit (TTM) ML : $409.26M FLYW : $299.78M
EBITDA (TTM) ML : $56.96M FLYW : $11.02B

Return for Risk

ML vs. FLYW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLYW

FLYW Risk / Return Rank: 65
FLYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
FLYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FLYW Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FLYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FLYW Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ML vs. FLYW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MoneyLion Inc. (ML) and Flywire Corporation (FLYW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ML	FLYW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	-0.29	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ML	FLYW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-84.40%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-28.16%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-75.98%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-84.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-74.28%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-56.05%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	10.49%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ML	FLYW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	13.57%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	36.75%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	47.09%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	57.36%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	57.35%	—

Dividends

ML vs. FLYW - Dividend Comparison

Neither ML nor FLYW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ML and FLYW in my portfolio?

ML and FLYW have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.