ML vs. COIN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ML (MoneyLion Inc.) and COIN (Coinbase Global, Inc.) are both stocks. ML operates in Software - Application (Technology), while COIN operates in Financial Data & Stock Exchanges (Financial Services). At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ML vs. COIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MoneyLion Inc. (ML) and Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ML

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COIN

• 1D: -6.19%
• 1M: -19.59%
• YTD: -27.82%
• 6M: -41.06%
• 1Y: -36.96%
• 3Y*: 36.24%
• 5Y*: -6.53%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ML vs. COIN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ML MoneyLion Inc.	0.00%	-0.13%	37.20%	237.04%	-84.62%	-59.58%
COIN Coinbase Global, Inc.	-27.82%	-8.92%	42.77%	391.44%	-85.98%	-23.12%

Correlation

The correlation between ML and COIN is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2021	0.34

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) ML : $545.91M COIN : $5.81B
Gross Profit (TTM) ML : $409.26M COIN : $4.65B
EBITDA (TTM) ML : $56.96M COIN : $1.68B

Return for Risk

ML vs. COIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COIN

COIN Risk / Return Rank: 20
COIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
COIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
COIN Omega Ratio Rank: 21
COIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
COIN Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ML vs. COIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MoneyLion Inc. (ML) and Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ML	COIN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	-0.15	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ML	COIN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-90.90%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-66.39%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-66.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-90.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-61.12%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-49.83%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	39.68%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ML	COIN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	19.13%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	50.99%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	70.20%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	85.85%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	85.39%	—

Dividends

ML vs. COIN - Dividend Comparison

Neither ML nor COIN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ML and COIN in my portfolio?

ML and COIN have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.