PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MKOR vs. ASIA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MKOR vs. ASIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR) and Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MKOR achieves a 96.84% return, which is significantly higher than ASIA's 33.47% return.


MKOR

1D
-0.99%
1M
16.82%
YTD
96.84%
6M
107.34%
1Y
187.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ASIA

1D
-1.35%
1M
11.70%
YTD
33.47%
6M
38.00%
1Y
66.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MKOR vs. ASIA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MKOR
Matthews Korea Active ETF
96.84%70.33%-15.76%7.97%
ASIA
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF
33.47%32.06%3.41%0.01%

Correlation

The correlation between MKOR and ASIA is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2023

0.71

The correlation between MKOR and ASIA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

MKOR vs. ASIA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MKOR
ASIA

Technology

56.1%
46.6%

Industrials

15.0%
11.6%

Financial Services

8.0%
17.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
7.5%

Communication Services

2.1%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

1.7%
1.1%

Healthcare

1.5%
4.0%

Basic Materials

0.8%
2.5%

Energy

0.6%
2.1%

Utilities

0.6%

-

Real Estate

-

2.9%

Technology

MKOR
56.1%
ASIA
46.6%

Industrials

MKOR
15.0%
ASIA
11.6%

Financial Services

MKOR
8.0%
ASIA
17.6%

Consumer Cyclical

MKOR
7.0%
ASIA
7.5%

Communication Services

MKOR
2.1%
ASIA
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

MKOR
1.7%
ASIA
1.1%

Healthcare

MKOR
1.5%
ASIA
4.0%

Basic Materials

MKOR
0.8%
ASIA
2.5%

Energy

MKOR
0.6%
ASIA
2.1%

Utilities

MKOR
0.6%
ASIA

-

Real Estate

MKOR

-

ASIA
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MKOR vs. ASIA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MKOR
MKOR Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
MKOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MKOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
MKOR Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
MKOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
MKOR Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

ASIA
ASIA Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ASIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASIA Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ASIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASIA Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MKOR vs. ASIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR) and Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MKORASIADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.55

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.16

4.59

+4.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

35.31

17.09

+18.22

MKOR vs. ASIA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MKOR Sharpe Ratio is 5.08, which is higher than the ASIA Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MKOR and ASIA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MKORASIADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.08

3.08

+2.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.57

1.24

+0.33

Drawdowns

MKOR vs. ASIA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MKOR drawdown since its inception was -22.09%, smaller than the maximum ASIA drawdown of -23.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MKOR and ASIA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MKORASIADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.09%

-23.95%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.62%

-14.47%

-6.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.27%

-1.35%

-0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.22%

-4.85%

-1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.34%

3.88%

+1.46%

Volatility

MKOR vs. ASIA - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR) has a higher volatility of 17.87% compared to Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) at 9.93%. This indicates that MKOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MKORASIADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.87%

9.93%

+7.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.29%

18.57%

+14.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.15%

21.56%

+15.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.06%

20.24%

+6.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.06%

20.24%

+6.82%

MKOR vs. ASIA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MKOR and ASIA have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

MKOR vs. ASIA - Dividend Comparison

MKOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, more than ASIA's 0.78% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
ASIA
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF
0.78%1.05%0.58%0.12%
MKOR
Matthews Korea Active ETF
1.33%2.62%5.28%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MKOR and ASIA have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MKOR has higher volatility (17.87%) compared to ASIA (9.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MKOR dropped -22.09% vs ASIA's -23.95%.

On 1-year performance, MKOR leads with 187.66% vs 66.09% for ASIA. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, ASIA has been the lower-risk option at 9.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MKOR has performed better with a 187.66% return vs 66.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MKOR and ASIA have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

MKOR has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.78% for ASIA.

MKOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.08 vs 3.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MKOR and ASIA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer