PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MJUS vs. FTSD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MJUS vs. FTSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS) and Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MJUS

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTSD

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.80%
6M
1.30%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
4.98%
5Y*
2.46%
10Y*
2.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MJUS vs. FTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MJUS
ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF
0.00%0.00%27.88%-17.41%-66.89%-39.41%
FTSD
Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF
0.80%5.66%5.20%4.84%-3.13%-0.78%

Correlation

The correlation between MJUS and FTSD is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2021

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MJUS vs. FTSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MJUS

FTSD
FTSD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FTSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTSD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FTSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTSD Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MJUS vs. FTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS) and Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MJUS vs. FTSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MJUSFTSDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

Drawdowns

MJUS vs. FTSD - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MJUSFTSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.11%

Volatility

MJUS vs. FTSD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MJUSFTSDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.79%

MJUS vs. FTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MJUS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FTSD's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

MJUS vs. FTSD - Dividend Comparison

MJUS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTSD
Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF
4.50%4.67%4.75%4.14%1.73%1.01%1.54%2.90%2.63%2.24%1.92%1.52%
MJUS
ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MJUS and FTSD have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FTSD is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FTSD is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MJUS.

FTSD has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 0.00% for MJUS.

MJUS is categorized as Cannabis, while FTSD is Mortgage Backed Securities. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MJUS and 0.25% for FTSD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MJUS and FTSD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer