PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MJ vs. HSMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MJ vs. HSMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MJ vs. HSMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MJ
ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF
-22.73%13.07%-23.97%-24.18%-61.55%-22.79%30.45%
HSMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF
1.79%1.57%13.17%5.01%-9.44%23.72%34.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MJ achieves a -22.73% return, which is significantly lower than HSMV's 1.79% return.


MJ

1D
9.36%
1M
-11.33%
YTD
-22.73%
6M
-37.17%
1Y
20.44%
3Y*
-15.21%
5Y*
-37.72%
10Y*

HSMV

1D
0.83%
1M
-5.20%
YTD
1.79%
6M
0.63%
1Y
2.50%
3Y*
7.20%
5Y*
4.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MJ vs. HSMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MJ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than HSMV's 0.80% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MJ vs. HSMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MJ
MJ Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
MJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
MJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MJ Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

HSMV
HSMV Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
HSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
HSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MJ vs. HSMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MJHSMVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.24

0.18

+0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.16

0.36

+0.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.05

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

0.30

+0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.81

1.11

-0.31

MJ vs. HSMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is higher than the HSMV Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MJ and HSMV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MJHSMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

0.18

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.64

0.28

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.51

0.67

-1.19

Correlation

The correlation between MJ and HSMV is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MJ vs. HSMV - Dividend Comparison

MJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than HSMV's 2.03% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
MJ
ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF
2.57%1.98%13.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HSMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF
2.03%2.01%1.43%1.43%1.26%0.76%0.80%

Drawdowns

MJ vs. HSMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MJ drawdown since its inception was -96.55%, which is greater than HSMV's maximum drawdown of -19.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MJ and HSMV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MJHSMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.55%

-19.16%

-77.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.66%

-10.57%

-38.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.52%

-19.16%

-74.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.01%

-5.59%

-89.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.66%

-5.71%

-62.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.07%

2.89%

+20.18%

Volatility

MJ vs. HSMV - Volatility Comparison

ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) has a higher volatility of 18.42% compared to First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV) at 3.53%. This indicates that MJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MJHSMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.42%

3.53%

+14.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.20%

7.15%

+52.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

84.94%

13.63%

+71.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.89%

15.02%

+43.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.44%

16.19%

+39.25%