PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIY vs. MUJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIY vs. MUJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund (MIY) and BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIY achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly higher than MUJ's 4.64% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MIY having a 2.39% annualized return and MUJ not far ahead at 2.47%.


MIY

1D
-0.66%
1M
0.54%
YTD
5.14%
6M
5.36%
1Y
13.47%
3Y*
9.00%
5Y*
-0.12%
10Y*
2.39%

MUJ

1D
-0.49%
1M
1.10%
YTD
4.64%
6M
4.23%
1Y
18.31%
3Y*
8.52%
5Y*
-0.02%
10Y*
2.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIY vs. MUJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIY
BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund
5.14%11.24%3.48%6.60%-24.10%10.04%7.27%19.51%-6.71%8.86%
MUJ
BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund
4.64%13.86%2.28%7.55%-26.31%15.20%5.95%18.95%-8.49%9.99%

Correlation

The correlation between MIY and MUJ is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 1998

0.38

The correlation between MIY and MUJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.53 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIY vs. MUJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIY
MIY Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
MIY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIY Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
MIY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIY Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

MUJ
MUJ Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MUJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
MUJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIY vs. MUJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund (MIY) and BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MIYMUJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.41

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

1.96

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.27

7.91

-3.64

MIY vs. MUJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIY Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the MUJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIY and MUJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MIYMUJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

2.09

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

-0.00

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

0.22

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.35

+0.02

Drawdowns

MIY vs. MUJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIY drawdown since its inception was -42.19%, roughly equal to the maximum MUJ drawdown of -41.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIY and MUJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIYMUJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.19%

-41.72%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.08%

-9.41%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.72%

-12.17%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.59%

-32.71%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

-32.71%

-1.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.35%

-3.46%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.32%

-9.04%

+0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

2.32%

+0.84%

Volatility

MIY vs. MUJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund (MIY) is 2.28%, while BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ) has a volatility of 2.82%. This indicates that MIY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIYMUJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.28%

2.82%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.32%

6.90%

+3.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.69%

8.82%

+2.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.67%

10.35%

+1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.95%

11.20%

+0.75%

MIY vs. MUJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIY has a 2.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MUJ's 2.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIY vs. MUJ - Dividend Comparison

MIY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.42%, more than MUJ's 5.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MIY
BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund
5.42%5.57%5.21%3.86%5.70%4.38%4.23%4.27%5.27%5.46%5.85%5.66%
MUJ
BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund
5.32%5.45%5.53%4.13%6.40%4.77%4.78%4.03%5.34%5.55%6.00%5.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


MIY and MUJ have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUJ has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to MIY (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIY dropped -42.19% vs MUJ's -41.72%.

MUJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIY and MUJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer