PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MITTX vs. MSFRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MITTX vs. MSFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust (MITTX) and MFS Total Return Fund (MSFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MITTX achieves a 8.24% return, which is significantly higher than MSFRX's 6.34% return. Over the past 10 years, MITTX has outperformed MSFRX with an annualized return of 13.25%, while MSFRX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.05% annualized return.


MITTX

1D
1.66%
1M
1.10%
6M
5.46%
YTD
8.24%
1Y
15.92%
3Y*
15.27%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
13.25%
ALL TIME*
7.50%

MSFRX

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.25%
6M
3.43%
YTD
6.34%
1Y
12.42%
3Y*
11.88%
5Y*
6.84%
10Y*
8.05%
ALL TIME*
6.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MITTX vs. MSFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MITTX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust
8.24%13.67%19.69%19.26%-16.27%26.73%18.72%31.92%-5.56%23.55%
MSFRX
MFS Total Return Fund
6.34%10.98%14.73%10.34%-9.70%14.00%9.72%20.20%-5.80%12.18%

Correlation

The correlation between MITTX and MSFRX is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 1973

0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between MITTX and MSFRX has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MITTX vs. MSFRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MITTX
MITTX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MITTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MITTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
MITTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MITTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
MITTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFRX
MSFRX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MSFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MITTX vs. MSFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust (MITTX) and MFS Total Return Fund (MSFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MITTXMSFRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.30

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

2.34

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.05

6.73

-0.68

MITTX vs. MSFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MITTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the MSFRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MITTX and MSFRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MITTX vs. MSFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MITTX drawdown since its inception was -49.54%, which is greater than MSFRX's maximum drawdown of -37.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MITTX and MSFRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MITTXMSFRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.54%

-37.28%

-12.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.76%

-4.96%

-4.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.10%

-8.35%

-7.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.27%

-17.02%

-6.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.45%

-24.70%

-8.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-0.88%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.51%

-4.99%

-5.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

1.72%

+0.60%

Volatility

MITTX vs. MSFRX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust (MITTX) has a higher volatility of 3.18% compared to MFS Total Return Fund (MSFRX) at 2.54%. This indicates that MITTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MITTXMSFRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

2.54%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.44%

5.30%

+4.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.09%

7.06%

+5.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.79%

9.78%

+6.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.18%

10.45%

+6.73%

MITTX vs. MSFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MITTX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than MSFRX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

MITTX vs. MSFRX - Dividend Comparison

MITTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.01%, more than MSFRX's 8.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MITTX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust
11.01%14.33%14.47%10.96%9.35%8.66%8.14%7.58%13.49%7.27%5.55%6.02%
MSFRX
MFS Total Return Fund
8.33%8.93%14.87%6.19%5.38%8.33%6.93%3.22%4.99%5.67%3.54%5.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


MITTX and MSFRX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MITTX has higher volatility (3.18%) compared to MSFRX (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MITTX dropped -49.54% vs MSFRX's -37.28%.

MSFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MITTX and MSFRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer