PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MISL vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MISL vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MISL achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 7.17% return.


MISL

1D
-2.71%
1M
5.48%
YTD
7.59%
6M
13.84%
1Y
32.38%
3Y*
28.35%
5Y*
10Y*

YCS

1D
0.17%
1M
4.42%
YTD
7.17%
6M
10.05%
1Y
32.82%
3Y*
19.84%
5Y*
23.54%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MISL vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MISL
First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF
7.59%41.24%20.48%14.78%8.22%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
7.17%9.04%35.41%28.70%-19.61%

Correlation

The correlation between MISL and YCS is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2022

0.02

The correlation between MISL and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MISL vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MISL
MISL Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MISL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MISL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
MISL Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MISL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
MISL Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MISL vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MISLYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

3.97

-1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.49

12.40

-6.90

MISL vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MISL Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MISL and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MISLYCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.92

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.35

0.33

+1.02

Drawdowns

MISL vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MISL drawdown since its inception was -17.91%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MISL and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MISLYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.91%

-49.56%

+31.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.69%

-8.30%

-7.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.91%

-23.05%

+5.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.75%

0.00%

-9.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-19.93%

+16.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.91%

2.66%

+3.25%

Volatility

MISL vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) has a higher volatility of 8.50% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.75%. This indicates that MISL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MISLYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.50%

2.75%

+5.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.14%

12.32%

+6.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.60%

17.27%

+5.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.14%

21.10%

-1.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.14%

19.01%

+0.13%

MISL vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MISL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

MISL vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

MISL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
MISL
First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.36%0.40%0.74%0.63%0.08%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MISL and YCS have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MISL has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to YCS (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MISL dropped -17.91% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 3-year performance, MISL leads with 28.35% vs 19.84% for YCS. On fees, MISL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, MISL has performed better with a 28.35% return vs 19.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MISL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

MISL has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

MISL is categorized as Industrials Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. MISL tracks Indxx US Aerospace & Defense Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for MISL and 1.00% for YCS.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MISL and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer