MISL vs. XAR
MISL (First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF) and XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MISL is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Indxx US Aerospace & Defense Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while XAR is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MISL returned 28.35%/yr vs 34.11%/yr for XAR. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MISL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XAR.
Performance
MISL vs. XAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MISL achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly lower than XAR's 13.40% return.
MISL
- 1D
- -2.71%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- YTD
- 7.59%
- 6M
- 13.84%
- 1Y
- 32.38%
- 3Y*
- 28.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XAR
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 7.34%
- YTD
- 13.40%
- 6M
- 20.10%
- 1Y
- 41.33%
- 3Y*
- 34.11%
- 5Y*
- 16.26%
- 10Y*
- 18.01%
MISL vs. XAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MISL First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF | 7.59% | 41.24% | 20.48% | 14.78% | 8.22% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 13.40% | 46.15% | 23.32% | 23.79% | 7.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between MISL and XAR is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2022 | 0.92 |
The correlation between MISL and XAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
MISL vs. XAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MISL
XAR
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
MISL
XAR
Technology
MISL
XAR
Basic Materials
MISL
-
XAR
-
Communication Services
MISL
-
XAR
-
Consumer Cyclical
MISL
-
XAR
-
Consumer Defensive
MISL
-
XAR
-
Energy
MISL
-
XAR
-
Financial Services
MISL
-
XAR
-
Healthcare
MISL
-
XAR
-
Real Estate
MISL
-
XAR
-
Utilities
MISL
-
XAR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MISL vs. XAR — Risk / Return Rank
MISL
XAR
MISL vs. XAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) and SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MISL | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.26 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 2.41 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.49 | 6.85 | -1.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MISL | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 1.55 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.35 | 0.85 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
MISL vs. XAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MISL drawdown since its inception was -17.91%, smaller than the maximum XAR drawdown of -46.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MISL and XAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MISL | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.91% | -46.37% | +28.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.69% | -17.22% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.91% | -19.73% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.75% | -6.55% | -3.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -6.79% | +3.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.91% | 6.05% | -0.14% |
Volatility
MISL vs. XAR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) is 8.50%, while SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a volatility of 9.52%. This indicates that MISL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MISL | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.50% | 9.52% | -1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.14% | 22.39% | -3.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.60% | 26.81% | -4.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.14% | 23.41% | -4.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.14% | 24.62% | -5.48% |
MISL vs. XAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
MISL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XAR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MISL vs. XAR - Dividend Comparison
MISL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, more than XAR's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MISL First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.36% | 0.40% | 0.74% | 0.63% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.32% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, MISL and XAR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XAR has higher volatility (9.52%) compared to MISL (8.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MISL dropped -17.91% vs XAR's -46.37%.
On 3-year performance, XAR leads with 34.11% vs 28.35% for MISL. On fees, XAR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, MISL has been the lower-risk option at 8.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XAR has performed better with a 34.11% return vs 28.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XAR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for MISL.
MISL has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.32% for XAR.
MISL is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XAR is Aerospace & Defense. MISL tracks Indxx US Aerospace & Defense Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for MISL and 0.35% for XAR.
XAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MISL and XAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer