MISL vs. QCLN
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN).
MISL and QCLN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MISL is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Indxx US Aerospace & Defense Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Oct 25, 2022. QCLN is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy. It was launched on Feb 8, 2007. Both MISL and QCLN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
MISL vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MISL vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MISL First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF | 6.94% | 41.24% | 20.48% | 14.78% | 8.22% |
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund | 5.17% | 31.81% | -18.86% | -10.02% | -16.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MISL achieves a 6.94% return, which is significantly higher than QCLN's 5.17% return.
MISL
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- -9.73%
- YTD
- 6.94%
- 6M
- 9.60%
- 1Y
- 51.50%
- 3Y*
- 27.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QCLN
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -4.61%
- YTD
- 5.17%
- 6M
- 8.63%
- 1Y
- 61.08%
- 3Y*
- -2.97%
- 5Y*
- -7.09%
- 10Y*
- 12.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MISL vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MISL and QCLN have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Return for Risk
MISL vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank
MISL
QCLN
MISL vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MISL | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.15 | 1.63 | +0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.87 | 2.23 | +0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.27 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 3.97 | -0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.29 | 12.27 | +0.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MISL | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | 1.63 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.45 | 0.15 | +1.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between MISL and QCLN is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MISL vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison
MISL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, more than QCLN's 0.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MISL First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.36% | 0.40% | 0.74% | 0.63% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund | 0.21% | 0.25% | 0.87% | 0.76% | 0.33% | 0.01% | 0.30% | 0.85% | 1.03% | 0.45% | 1.24% | 0.72% |
Drawdowns
MISL vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MISL drawdown since its inception was -17.91%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MISL and QCLN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MISL | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.91% | -76.18% | +58.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.45% | -16.18% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -69.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -71.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.30% | -45.67% | +35.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.17% | -43.54% | +40.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 5.24% | -1.04% |
Volatility
MISL vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) is 8.47%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 13.73%. This indicates that MISL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MISL | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.47% | 13.73% | -5.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.76% | 27.33% | -9.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.09% | 37.76% | -13.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 37.87% | -19.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 34.62% | -15.92% |