PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIOTA-USD vs. XEM-USD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MIOTA-USD vs. XEM-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IOTA (MIOTA-USD) and NEM (XEM-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIOTA-USD achieves a -26.81% return, which is significantly higher than XEM-USD's -54.05% return.


MIOTA-USD

1D
1.60%
1M
0.03%
YTD
-26.81%
6M
-41.79%
1Y
-66.35%
3Y*
-32.77%
5Y*
-42.33%
10Y*

XEM-USD

1D
-5.57%
1M
-19.59%
YTD
-54.05%
6M
-60.97%
1Y
-94.18%
3Y*
-73.79%
5Y*
-68.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIOTA-USD vs. XEM-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIOTA-USD
IOTA
-26.81%-76.93%15.49%76.20%-87.61%360.18%85.39%-55.09%-89.96%563.17%
XEM-USD
NEM
-54.05%-95.00%-39.05%36.89%-76.79%-40.13%542.53%-49.78%-93.76%352.41%

Correlation

The correlation between MIOTA-USD and XEM-USD is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between MIOTA-USD and XEM-USD has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIOTA-USD vs. XEM-USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIOTA-USD
MIOTA-USD Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MIOTA-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIOTA-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIOTA-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MIOTA-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIOTA-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

XEM-USD
XEM-USD Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
XEM-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEM-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEM-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
XEM-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEM-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIOTA-USD vs. XEM-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IOTA (MIOTA-USD) and NEM (XEM-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MIOTA-USDXEM-USDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

0.76

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

-1.01

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.41

-1.18

-0.23

MIOTA-USD vs. XEM-USD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIOTA-USD Sharpe Ratio is -0.95, which is lower than the XEM-USD Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIOTA-USD and XEM-USD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MIOTA-USDXEM-USDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.95

-0.71

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.45

-0.64

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.21

-0.38

+0.17

Drawdowns

MIOTA-USD vs. XEM-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIOTA-USD drawdown since its inception was -98.99%, roughly equal to the maximum XEM-USD drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIOTA-USD and XEM-USD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIOTA-USDXEM-USDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.99%

-99.97%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-78.31%

-93.07%

+14.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-86.57%

-99.14%

+12.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.29%

-99.79%

+2.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.92%

-99.97%

+1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.52%

-90.08%

+0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

55.10%

51.49%

+3.61%

Volatility

MIOTA-USD vs. XEM-USD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IOTA (MIOTA-USD) is 19.19%, while NEM (XEM-USD) has a volatility of 22.35%. This indicates that MIOTA-USD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEM-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIOTA-USDXEM-USDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.19%

22.35%

-3.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.49%

56.04%

-6.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.10%

112.41%

-46.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.43%

88.88%

-8.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

93.80%

103.77%

-9.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


MIOTA-USD and XEM-USD have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XEM-USD has higher volatility (22.35%) compared to MIOTA-USD (19.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIOTA-USD dropped -98.99% vs XEM-USD's -99.97%.

XEM-USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.71 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIOTA-USD and XEM-USD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer