MINV vs. IAU
MINV (Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF) and IAU (iShares Gold Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - MINV is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by Matthews, while IAU is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. MINV is actively managed, while IAU is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MINV returned 31.39%/yr vs 29.07%/yr for IAU. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MINV charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IAU.
Performance
MINV vs. IAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MINV achieves a 51.67% return, which is significantly higher than IAU's -2.44% return.
MINV
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- YTD
- 51.67%
- 6M
- 53.62%
- 1Y
- 81.42%
- 3Y*
- 31.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IAU
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -9.54%
- YTD
- -2.44%
- 6M
- -2.22%
- 1Y
- 22.32%
- 3Y*
- 29.07%
- 5Y*
- 17.23%
- 10Y*
- 12.31%
MINV vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINV Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF | 51.67% | 30.85% | 17.32% | -2.66% | -2.87% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | -2.44% | 63.95% | 26.85% | 12.84% | 5.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between MINV and IAU is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MINV vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank
MINV
IAU
MINV vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MINV | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.19 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.23 | 0.99 | +6.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.28 | 2.83 | +15.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MINV vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MINV drawdown since its inception was -23.49%, smaller than the maximum IAU drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINV and IAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MINV | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.49% | -45.14% | +21.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.91% | -24.40% | +13.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.82% | -24.40% | +4.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.24% | -22.03% | +15.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.06% | -15.97% | +7.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.31% | 8.47% | -4.16% |
Volatility
MINV vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV) has a higher volatility of 13.99% compared to iShares Gold Trust (IAU) at 7.70%. This indicates that MINV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MINV | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.99% | 7.70% | +6.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.75% | 23.94% | -0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.05% | 27.17% | -0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.22% | 18.16% | +6.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.22% | 16.02% | +8.20% |
MINV vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
MINV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
MINV vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison
MINV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MINV Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF | 1.00% | 1.51% | 0.25% | 1.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MINV and IAU have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MINV has higher volatility (13.99%) compared to IAU (7.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MINV dropped -23.49% vs IAU's -45.14%.
On 3-year performance, MINV leads with 31.39% vs 29.07% for IAU. On fees, IAU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IAU has been the lower-risk option at 7.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MINV has performed better with a 31.39% return vs 29.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for MINV.
MINV has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.
MINV is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IAU is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Matthews and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for MINV and 0.25% for IAU.
MINV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MINV and IAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer