MINT vs. SAP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) and SAP SE (SAP).

MINT is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Nov 16, 2009.

Performance

MINT vs. SAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) and SAP SE (SAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MINT vs. SAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	0.91%	4.74%	5.94%	6.26%	-1.01%	-0.03%	1.62%	3.34%	1.72%	1.86%
SAP SAP SE	-29.52%	-0.48%	61.27%	52.30%	-24.64%	9.22%	-1.28%	36.43%	-10.04%	31.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MINT achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly higher than SAP's -29.52% return. Over the past 10 years, MINT has underperformed SAP with an annualized return of 2.67%, while SAP has yielded a comparatively higher 9.48% annualized return.

MINT

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 0.91%
• 6M: 2.06%
• 1Y: 4.54%
• 3Y*: 5.51%
• 5Y*: 3.32%
• 10Y*: 2.67%

SAP

• 1D: 1.74%
• 1M: -15.04%
• YTD: -29.52%
• 6M: -35.93%
• 1Y: -35.66%
• 3Y*: 12.00%
• 5Y*: 8.02%
• 10Y*: 9.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MINT vs. SAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINT

MINT Risk / Return Rank: 100
MINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Omega Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MINT Martin Ratio Rank: 99

SAP

SAP Risk / Return Rank: 7
SAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
SAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
SAP Omega Ratio Rank: 6
SAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
SAP Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MINT vs. SAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) and SAP SE (SAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MINT	SAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	12.67	-1.09	+13.77
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	24.74	-1.48	+26.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	9.74	0.80	+8.94
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	28.46	-0.75	+29.21
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	234.85	-1.74	+236.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MINT vs. SAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MINT Sharpe Ratio is 12.67, which is higher than the SAP Sharpe Ratio of -1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MINT and SAP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MINT	SAP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.67	-1.09	+13.77
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	5.75	0.29	+5.46
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	2.84	0.34	+2.50
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.42	0.14	+2.28

Correlation

The correlation between MINT and SAP is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MINT vs. SAP - Dividend Comparison

MINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, more than SAP's 1.48% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	4.48%	4.63%	5.22%	4.91%	1.90%	0.44%	1.15%	2.65%	2.32%	1.61%	1.35%	0.88%
SAP SAP SE	1.48%	1.05%	0.97%	1.41%	2.05%	1.56%	1.31%	1.27%	1.73%	0.87%	1.08%	1.11%

Drawdowns

MINT vs. SAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINT drawdown since its inception was -4.62%, smaller than the maximum SAP drawdown of -87.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINT and SAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	MINT	SAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.62%	-87.91%	+83.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.16%	-47.42%	+47.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-2.42%	-47.42%	+45.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-4.62%	-51.31%	+46.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-45.11%	+45.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.17%	-28.13%	+27.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.02%	20.38%	-20.36%

Volatility

MINT vs. SAP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) is 0.08%, while SAP SE (SAP) has a volatility of 9.33%. This indicates that MINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MINT	SAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.08%	9.33%	-9.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.18%	25.59%	-25.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36%	32.74%	-32.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.58%	27.86%	-27.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.95%	27.81%	-26.86%