MINT vs. IAUM
MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) and IAUM (iShares Gold Trust Micro) are both exchange-traded funds - MINT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO, while IAUM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. MINT is actively managed, while IAUM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MINT returned 5.40%/yr vs 29.28%/yr for IAUM. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MINT charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IAUM.
Performance
MINT vs. IAUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MINT achieves a 1.94% return, which is significantly higher than IAUM's -2.40% return.
MINT
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 2.19%
- 1Y
- 4.72%
- 3Y*
- 5.40%
- 5Y*
- 3.49%
- 10Y*
- 2.72%
IAUM
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -10.19%
- YTD
- -2.40%
- 6M
- -2.08%
- 1Y
- 24.22%
- 3Y*
- 29.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MINT vs. IAUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 1.94% | 4.74% | 5.94% | 6.26% | -1.01% | -0.14% |
IAUM iShares Gold Trust Micro | -2.40% | 64.27% | 27.04% | 13.12% | -0.49% | 3.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between MINT and IAUM is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2021 | 0.10 |
The correlation between MINT and IAUM shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MINT vs. IAUM — Risk / Return Rank
MINT
IAUM
MINT vs. IAUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) and iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MINT | IAUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +16.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +65.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 21.62 | 1.19 | +20.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 95.35 | 1.00 | +94.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 965.15 | 2.87 | +962.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MINT vs. IAUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MINT drawdown since its inception was -4.62%, smaller than the maximum IAUM drawdown of -24.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINT and IAUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MINT | IAUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.62% | -24.37% | +19.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.05% | -24.37% | +24.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.16% | -24.37% | +24.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -4.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -21.99% | +21.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -5.38% | +5.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 8.46% | -8.46% |
Volatility
MINT vs. IAUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) is 0.09%, while iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) has a volatility of 7.71%. This indicates that MINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MINT | IAUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.09% | 7.71% | -7.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.20% | 23.82% | -23.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27% | 27.06% | -26.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.58% | 18.05% | -17.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.95% | 18.05% | -17.10% |
MINT vs. IAUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MINT has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than IAUM's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
MINT vs. IAUM - Dividend Comparison
MINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, while IAUM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAUM iShares Gold Trust Micro | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 4.28% | 4.63% | 5.22% | 4.91% | 1.90% | 0.44% | 1.15% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 1.61% | 1.35% | 0.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MINT and IAUM have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IAUM has higher volatility (7.71%) compared to MINT (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MINT dropped -4.62% vs IAUM's -24.37%.
On 3-year performance, IAUM leads with 29.28% vs 5.40% for MINT. On fees, IAUM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, MINT has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IAUM has performed better with a 29.28% return vs 5.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAUM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for MINT.
MINT has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 0.00% for IAUM.
MINT is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while IAUM is Gold. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for MINT and 0.09% for IAUM.
MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.51 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MINT and IAUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer